this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
2206 points (92.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5402 readers
2949 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uis@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (57 children)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (47 children)

I'm all for an individual decreasing their own consumption for the environment. I try to do that. But decreasing someone else's quality of life is where it gets dicy. You can very easily get discrimination.

[–] potatar@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Put a high upper limit only. Don't touch the bottomline.

For example, no more than 4 cars per person: Average Joe won't even know this rule exists but it will still reduce mineral mining due to people who collect cars.

Possible problems with my shitty example: Now a car is a controlled substance. Who decides the limit and how? What if there is a mental disease (with a better example this would make more sense) which requires a person to have 20 cars?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I believe that's called Clarkson's Disease and mostly affects lovable assholes.

I think a better solution is to give everyone less reasons to need and use cars, that a ban becomes unnecessary. But if we're putting limits on things to reduce their consumption, that's what excise taxes are for, most places already do it for fuel.

And of course there could always be taxation relative to a person or company's environmental impact. People get angry at this one.

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Hell yeah, 100% tax over certain net worth.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

NO JAY LENO NOOOOO WE CAN'T SEND JAY LENO TO THE GULAG NOOOO

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Cars already have defined limits. You already have to have insurance, for example. They are already registered in a person's name. This could be actually easily implemented.

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)