this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
925 points (98.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
358 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Image description: a screenshot from the Wikipedia page for the Doctor Who TV series, with a user-added caption that reads "Preserve the media you can before it's gone forever." The Wikipedia article reads, "No 1960s episodes exist on their original videotapes (all surviving prints being film transfers), though some were transferred to film for editing before transmission and exist in their broadcast form. [88] Some episodes have been returned to the BBC from the archives of other countries that bought prints for broadcast or by private individuals who acquired them by various means. Early colour videotape recordings made off-air by fans have also been retrieved, as well as excerpts filmed from the television screen onto 8 mm cine film and clips that were shown on other programmes. Audio versions of all lost episodes exist from home viewers who made tape recordings of the show. Short clips from every story with the exception of Marco Polo (1964), "Mission to the Unknown" (1965) and The Massacre (1966) also exist."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They should be archiving a lot more of the internet, too, including all media

Maybe most media; there's stuff that should not exist.

And yes, two girls, one cup and one man, one bottle are within the preservation threshold.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was talking more like child pornography should no be preserved.

[–] eggdaddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Just the thought of it makes me ill. I don't get it. Even before my two daughters were born it was pretty gross and I got why they were shanked all the time in prison but once I had them... it went to disgust and the possibility of jail time if someone did anything like that to them.

Here is the suck... there HAS to be an archive of it to be used to help save kids, identify locations, get other clues, etc... Without an archive, it would be near impossible to do anything.

For a small glimpse of that fucked shit and why an archive is needed, check out a yt vid called Mr Swirl: The Internet's Most Disturbed User. It's not even a vid on why archiving is good, it's just a vid on how they got this shitheel but proves my point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)