this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
2325 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32464 readers
664 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm trying out Obsidian for taking notes, and this made me laugh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago (73 children)

I never get the need to use vim and nano exists.

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It just makes a lot of stuff way easier once you know how to use it. Switching out a word for another: two button-presses, duplicating a line: three presses, deleting 500 consecutive lines: five presses

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But you can do all that with nano and it is straight forward and you don't need to memorize any key combinations. I mean, I get it and no judgement here. I just use nano because it's easy and quick.

[–] prismaTK@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think if you just need to edit a config file once in a while, nano is great, but if you’re writing substantial amounts of code, you’ll find vim a lot more capable.

As long as you’re not a filthy emacs user, we can get along

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I write my code in an actual IDE. And I use nano for only, like you said, config files and those little things. And I have never used emacs and I don't even know how it looks like. I'm dead serious, I don't even know what emacs is or what it does. lmao

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Emacs is basically a lisp interpreter packaged with a suite of "example" utilities, like a text editor. It's one of the two historical editors used as terminal IDEs, along with vim. Emacs tends to take a more batteries, kitchen sink, web browser, games, IRC client, etc-included approach. It can seriously be closer to an OS in functionality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (69 replies)