this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

502 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve migrated from cloudflare pages to cloudflare tunnels as I wanted to do a little bit more.

I can’t segregate my network as my ISPs router is rather limited, which means no vLANs. Connecting another router would introduce a double nat as they don't allow bridging. So I'm running my website basically "raw" in a hyperV virtual machine. the website is semi-static and made out of flatfiles, therefore it's is quite impossible to login into it. as stated before i’m using cloudflare tunnels to expose a nginx server to the interner. what are the chances someone or something (bot) inflataring my network? 100% safety is not possible but how safe am i?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] djgizmo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Meh. Safeish. Until one of your servers has a zero day.

[–] pastelstocking@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Everything has some sort of vulnerability, the qestion is will someone be assed to abuse it.(rheotical question)

[–] djgizmo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not so much will someone be assed about it, it’s whether a script will pick you up your server. There’s a ton of aggregation search engines that scan most IPv4 addresses and list them on what ports are open etc. such as Shodan.io

Like I said, safeish.

[–] weeman45@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As far as i understood it a cloudflare tunneled service should not be visible when port scanning. Or am i completely wrong here? I started using tunnels just so i can avoid opening ports to the internet. I also restricted the access to my services to specific countries.

[–] djgizmo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The only thing a CF tunnel does is protect your home IP. Doesn’t protect the app or server you’re exposing.

[–] amizzo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well it does slightly more than just obfuscating your home IP, in that it will also do automatic bot, DDOS prevention, etc...

[–] djgizmo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Nothing will stop a general scan from happening. Especially if it’s a slow scan.

Scans won’t trigger dos/ddos alerts.

[–] amizzo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, that would get your host IP...if they're doing a general scan of whole ISP IP ranges (Which nothing could really stop, except for a good firewall). But there is much more low-hanging fruit for hackers than to scan tens of thousands of unoccupied subnets.

[–] djgizmo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ilulz. Automated scans cost nothing in resources. That would not find a host IP, it’d find the public Ip and open port.

[–] amizzo@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I would consider time a pretty major resource....and yes, you are correct I misspoke/typed. I meant public IP, not host IP...

Anyway, the point is not to prevent all attack vectors (which is impossible, unless you're totally offline/air-gapped/etc), OP wants to minimize the probability of infiltration. So to get back to the question, yes CF tunnels help with that when implemented correctly.

[–] pastelstocking@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

tunnels are reverse-portforwarding. ports aren't open on my network but on theirs.

anyways i moved back on VPS because im not 100% sure what is my ISPs stance lmao. and since i cant have much control with my internal network for now, id rather stay away but i def wanna host at home eventually

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)