this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

16 readers
2 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

How important are tags in Kbin for engagement in posts? Are they vital, or just useful in spreading a post?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kubica@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

They are more of a concept coming from mastdodon type of posts.
But currently there are no lists or possibilities to subscribe to them here.
So you/we can use them and navigate but with certain limitations.

For my liking kbin is lacking lists so that not all follows have to be seen mixed in a single place.
In such lists if they existed it would be awesome that there could be subscriptions to both communities and tags.

[–] Teppic@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

True, but I think they make it easier to find posts originating here on kbin using say Mastodon.

There is also a difference between Posts and Articles here which I haven't fully fathomed - I think perhaps articles are more Mastodon compatible, while posts are more aligned with Lemmy... But hopefully somebody more enlightened will provide more detail and/or correct me there!

[–] boothin@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Other way around! Articles are the reddit/lemmy like content while posts are what go to the microblog and are the mastodon/Twitter like content.

[–] SweetAIBelle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

In some cases, literally mastodon content. If you are on mastadon and you put @magazine@instance in your post, it shows up on that magazines microblog, on kbin, at least.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)