this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
132 points (93.4% liked)

Starfield

2847 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

<spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (41 children)

I really don't think the empty planets are the problem. Space Engineers has empty planets. Stationeers has empty planets. But they have interesting things to do on those empty planets. Problems to solve. Systems to build and improve.

Everything in Starfield feels like more clicking through (horribly outdated) menus and inventory screens. Between those and the loading screens, the only time the game is really fun is when you're shooting pirates. But there are games that do that part much much better.

I think that's how I'd summarize the whole game: lots of things to do but none of it has any depth and everything has been done much better elsewhere.

[–] Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Everything in Starfield feels like more clicking through (horribly outdated) menus and inventory screens. Between those and the loading screens, the only time the game is really fun is when you're shooting pirates. But there are games that do that part much much better.

This is just a summary of modern Bethesda games in a nutshell, except forgetting to mention bugs as well.

I really don't know what people where expecting with Starfield

[–] c0c0c0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The game has some issues but, surprisingly, bugs really aren't one of them.

[–] CIWS-30@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I think Microsoft can be thanked for that. They buckled down and lent their support to make sure Starfield didn't have constant crashes and backwards flying spaceships and whatnot.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)