this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
307 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22083 readers
249 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CadeJohnson@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

he is not wrong about moderators being like "landed gentry" in a lot of cases; but on the other hand the blackout already did the damage. Time will tell if he is dead-man-walking, but I already deleted all my content (posts and replies) and unsubscribed from all. Some people may feel angst that the blackout did not "win", but it was a very useful occasion to focus on the reddit phenomenon and recognize our commoditization. I had been glad to contribute content, but if reddit is going to then I am done. That is all the win I need. I will contribute it here (lemmy servers) instead.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the landed gentry point sits poorly with me because many of the most committed mods (I mean the ones who actively put work into their communities, I'm not referring to the powermods collecting subs like General Grievous collecting lightsabres) put hours of work into curating and building a community. Reddit is built on so much volunteer labour and for Huffman to use phrases like "landed gentry" is outrageous

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

We all recognized there was a mod power issue in a ton of subs. Lots of local subs getting unjustly censored, mods swaying discussions, or companies astroturfing. The landed gentry thing is pretty spot on. That said, it's better than admins taking over if the mods don't toe the corporate line.

load more comments (1 replies)