this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

989 readers
59 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
32
your Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be counted (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

archive: https://archive.ph/wRpVA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

bayesian epistemology for sure

[–] Collectivist@awful.systems -4 points 3 weeks ago

Well naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I've yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.