this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
854 points (92.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5765 readers
2881 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 75 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

They aren't protecting you. They are protecting themselves from what you may give their enemies. Don't think just because the federal government is doing something "for the people" that nominally it's not about the government itself. National security is literally the government protecting itself by protecting its citizens.

[–] Sakychu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty much this! Also it is much easier and cheaper to tell Google to stop offering tiktok in their app store then it is to build affordable housing where it is needed..

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yea but where? There’s a push for it in my state. Drove past a new area that will be a neighborhood of cookie cutter SFH, probably with driveways too short to contain full size vehicles. And they’ll cost more than half a million so I’m not sure how that’s affordable. Anyway. It’s being built on the flood plain. 8/10 flood factor.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

We really need more high density housing closer to urban centers, but Americans seem to be allergic to it. Everyone wants their single family house. Also too, without subsidies they're is no profit incentive for developers to build the necessary housing stock, they all shoot for "luxury" housing because it's the most profitable.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've always wanted like... A townhome. But the problem is anything like that (even away from city/population centers but still near enough to commute is astronomically expensive.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If only we made a school for teaching people how to do the things we need most. It could be run by the government as a nonprofit. We could incorporate medical and all the other industries we are getting gouged by.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, public state universities could fulfill this role if they could get past their admin rot

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

without subsidies they’re is no profit incentive for developers to build the necessary housing stock

So cap rent. If a developer wants to build, they need to build what people actually need. You don't need to hand them boatloads of money to make affordable housing more profitable than non-affordable housing, just ban the unaffordable housing nobody needs.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, the obvious solution: more suburban blight.

load more comments (21 replies)