this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
254 points (99.6% liked)

Open Source

31385 readers
191 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/45026885

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gomp@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I must say, this whole shitshow has been pretty funny to watch :)

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm completely out of the loop. What happened?

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Winamp published their code as "open source". Problem is...

  1. It wasn't open source, it was proprietary but you can see the source code.
  2. Their custom license didn't even allow forks, which is against GitHub TOS
  3. The codebase apparently contains proprietary code from third parties that they don't have the right to relicense.
  4. The codebase apparently contains GPL code from third parties that they probably didn't have the right to make proprietary in the first place
[–] theshatterstone54 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, there's GPL code there as well???

I'd heard of all the others but this ome kinda snuck under the radar with all the larger issues at play here

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

The article on theregister stated

Also inside the uploaded source code was some GPL 2 source code, which renders the not-very-open WCL moot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)