And "if you're a third party presidential candidate voter, you're doing more to harm Palestinians than if you vote for either genocidal candidate." *The level of gaslighting defies credibility; yet here we all are.

*Quotation marks added for clarity.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

glasses-off

And if you're a third party presidential candidate voter, you're doing more to harm Palestinians than if you vote for either genocidal candidate. The level of gaslighting defies credibility; yet here we all are.

glasses-on

VOTE for Genocide!

~~Lol no, get fucked nazi.~~

Edit: Turns out I was replying to sarcasm, unfortunately hard to tell these days

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's worth bothering arguing with them, anymore, since it tends to deflect from both major parties being the beneficiaries and at least sideline architects of genocide. I'm voting Claudia. I said what I said, nothing to argue about. Let them shadowbox.

Eta: didn't think I'd need the sarcasm tag, in my original comment. But I will add quotation marks.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh my B, I'll edit too

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

No worries. I understand the confusion. Thanks though.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)