Ham Radio

770 readers

1 users here now

This community is for anything related to ham/amateur radios

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

pingveno@lemmy.ml

Choosing between a full-time APRS or packet station? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by minorsecond@lemmy.ml to c/hamradio@lemmy.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I love playing with packet, and I love playing with APRS. So how do I decide?

There’s quite a bit of both packet and APRS activity in the area. I don’t want to put up another antenna at the moment because funds won’t allow, otherwise I’d get another cheap 2m rig for APRS.

On packet, I occasionally check in with other hams and send messages. I mostly keep it running because my webmap at packetradiomap.com uses my radio to map locally received stations. I could modify the webmap to not use my radio though.

I feel running an APRS station is more “useful” though, as my area isn’t covered very well by iGates or digipeaters.

So if you had to choose, would you go full time APRS or packet?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UnexampledSalt@lemmy.ko4abp.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would personally go for packet because it fits my preferences. Im not really looking for location tracking or iGates. I'm wanting a dedicated message system. Packet would be my choice for that.

[–] minorsecond@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of what I'm leaning toward. The only real reason I'm considering APRS is because my FT-5D can't hit any iGates or digipeaters when I'm around my house. But do I really need APRS when I'm at home? I don't think so.

[–] UnexampledSalt@lemmy.ko4abp.com 2 points 1 year ago

I don't either, but I've never been big into APRS.