this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1435 readers
200 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 months ago (6 children)

In this timeline, we have a number of terms for groups of days... 😶

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Right? What a weird way to put it. It sounds, i dunno, very L. Ron Hubbard-ish?

[–] istewart@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Altman is certainly aware of what it takes to be a Jobs-like marketing personality (and probably holds Hubbard-like totalism as a not-so-secret ambition), he's just not, uh, very good at it. He's put the most effort into the strictly lower-case, faux-casual persona on Twitter to seem "approachable" in a social media context, and that doesn't help him at all when trying to actually appear serious.

I also don't doubt that he's beginning to succumb to the yes-man filter bubble that traps so many public personalities. That's surely made worse by the likelihood that any underlings he might have reviewing this crap are drinking the AI koolaid and "punching everything up!" with a few rounds of ChatGPT.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

that's one tiny thing I'll give Altman - he doesn't seem to have run this through ChatGPT.

That said, VCs generally use ghost writers.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah, "thousands of days" seems like a first-draft attempt at "let's choose a unit of smaller magnitude to make this seem more serious to the plebs." And everyone around him drowning their brains in GPT slurry shouted, "excellent turn of phrase, sir!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)