this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
1368 points (96.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9545 readers
865 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Is your suggestion to let the Israelis take your land more slowly, so they don’t kill as many of your children?

By the way, 60,000 of them are Americans.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I wasn't suggesting anything, I was asking what the numbers are like. I think how many people will die as a result of each policy is something that probably does make sense to consider.

[–] MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I’m sorry, it’s hard to tell if someone is sincere or Just Asking Questions. In this case, the options are a slow genocide (West Bank) or a fast genocide (Gaza), so the short term numbers alone paint a misleading picture of the relative merits of each strategy. Israel’s gonna remove the brown people either way.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd just be interested to see how over time if those two numbers differ. If there's a big difference then that'd of course weigh on the considerations. If they're close to each other, then that'd also affect it. I just found population estimates and death estimates for current Gaza conflict but not really a good comparison for the two.

[–] MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, the slow genocide will be slower of course. It’s hardly worth bothering to google something that obvious. Still genocide though. Israelis are using violence to kill and/or displace Palestinian residents of the West Bank. They’ll take it all, eventually.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

If it is way slower or much less deadly in the short/moderate time, then it's not hard to see why some would prefer that. Death now or death maybe somewhere in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)