this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
1141 points (100.0% liked)

196

16244 readers
2169 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] StormWalker@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (36 children)

How can a rocket and thrusters work in space when there is no atmosphere to push against? The space ship/rocket would stay still and all the thrust matter would just be ejected. - For example, If the rocket wants to turn left, it is always shown as firing a thruster from the right side that turns the rocket/ship to the left. But in a vacuum all that would happen is the matter that came out of the thruster would be sucked into the vacuum and spread out evenly. The ship would not move. ๐Ÿค” Nothing to push against.

Edit: I see now (from the more helpful replies) That it is not the rocket pushing back, but rather the combusting expanding fuel that is pushing the rocket forward. Which makes sense to me now.

Google says thrusters are similar, in that it is expanding steam etc.

[โ€“] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (15 children)
[โ€“] douglasg14b@programming.dev 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Given how many people think that railguns have no recoil because "there is no explosion" they might actually seriously believe what they just wrote.

Scientific illiteracy is through the roof.

Or maybe it's the same as it it's always been it's just that people that are scientifically illiterate are given platforms to speak their illiteracy as truth.

[โ€“] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I remember when Falkon 9 was doing its first landings, the whole YouTube comments section was filled with flat earthers claiming it's a CGI. Now you can take a car and go watch landings in person, I wonder where all those people went.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)