this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
586 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (9 children)

For antivirus definitions? No, and you wouldn’t want to.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (8 children)

But it sounds like this added files / drivers or something, not just antivirus rules?

[–] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 26 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Turns out it was a content update that caused the driver to crash but the update itself wasn't a driver (as per their latest update.)

[–] wolfylow@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Found this post that explains what happened in detail: https://lemmy.ohaa.xyz/post/3522666

As an application developer (rather than someone who can/does code operating systems) I was just left open-mouthed …

Looks like they’re delivering “code as content” to get around the rigour of getting an updated driver authorised by MS. I realise they can’t wait too long for driver approval for antivirus releases but surely - surely - you have an ironclad QA process if you’re playing with fire like this.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)