this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
136 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13633 readers
806 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 51 points 5 months ago (18 children)

lmao pure cope.

There is no way Kamala boosts down ballot candidates and she will also eat shit to Trump.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 34 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Remember when we used to say Hillary Clinton was uniquely qualified to lose to Trump? Because Trump is historically unpopular? I know its been 8 years, but personally the only change I make to that statement personally is adding Biden to that and thats only because he's dying in front of us. I don't think Kamala eats shit. If she loses itll be barely. Like idk when the narrative changed but I disagree with the change. I still think almost anyone can beat Trump. Theres already polls showing her either winning or performing better than Biden in the swing states and thats before she's selected and had time to actually build herself.

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think anybody with a D next to their name and more charisma than a cave moss could beat Trump, but the short list of candidates the DNC is likely to consider (Hillary, Kamala, Pete, Joe) all fail to reach that bar.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

more charisma than a cave moss

I agree that Pete fails to meet this bar (I guess) but I think Kamala has at least that much lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)