/kbin meta

16 readers

2 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago

Now that federation works, we need more clarity of source (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by parrot-party@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing the federated content, but it's hard to tell where the content came from. Currently, the only reliable way to see the source is by reading the URL when you're viewing a thread. It doesn't work well on mobile though and it doesn't work for the feed.

How work everyone feel if the magazine included the source always? So instead of saying kbinMeta, you'd see kbinMeta@kbin.social? Or would you prefer another solution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tinwhiskers@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

In a fediverse, does it really matter? (yes it will be nice to have though, maybe just because we haven't adjusted to the fediverse mindset yet though).

[–] Jakeypoo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think it’s very important to see.

Is this viral post from the meme magazine I’m subscribed to? If not I should.

Also paying attention the the rules of whatever instance you are about to post in is pretty important.

load more comments (7 replies)