this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
68 points (95.9% liked)

UK Politics

3095 readers
341 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A projection of how the election results would look if we used Additional Member System (AMS), like in Scotland and Wales.

Party AMS FPTP Seat change
Labour 236 411 +175
LibDems 77 71 -6
Green 42 4 -38
SNP 18 9 -9
Plaid Cymru 4 4 0
Reform 94 5 -89
Conservative 157 121 -36
Northern Ireland 18 18 0
Other 4 6 +2
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mannycalavera 22 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Aaaaaand this is why Labour will never countenance this within this parliament.

Despite still being the largest party they'd have to cooperate and form alliances with other parties. Why would they want to do that when they don't have to.

I fear the only way to PR of any sort is to have a situation with a hung parliament where Labour / Conservative parties hold no sway over the eventual coalition that would need to form. Instead a Green / Lib Dem coalition would need to introduce this. And ๐Ÿคฃ that will never happen.

[โ€“] david 1 points 4 months ago (8 children)

To be fair, the PR result is far, far worse than what we have - only 4 Reform seats. It's not a great time to be selling PR.

[โ€“] mannycalavera 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yes Reform would have far more seats under PR, but I don't believe that changes the overarching principle of the matter: fair and representative representation based on votes cast.

Singling out a bogeyman doesn't answer the principle. Do you want people to feel like their vote counts? That's the important part for me.

[โ€“] david 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The party list system would mean that Nigel Farage was never out of parliament in the last ages. He would win every time.

[โ€“] mannycalavera 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He would win as long as people want him to win, surely? The question is do you think that's more democratic or not?

[โ€“] david 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, with the party list system, any one party which gets north of something like 60,000 votes gets an MP and the party chooses who gets the seat, so the leader cannot lose their seat. They are immune from becoming unelected, no matter how unpopular.

In our current system, if you can't find a locality that wants you, you lose. Reform might have got a lot of votes, but its candidates are very unpopular, for good reason, and they don't win elections much. It's only because the Conservatives have been a total shit show that they got any MPs at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)