Programming

17025 readers

142 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

201

The Creators of the Atom Code Editor Open-Source Zed, Their New Rust-Based High-Performance Editor (www.infoq.com)

submitted 6 months ago by LinearArray@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] uid0gid0@lemmy.world 107 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

runs only on MacOS

And

get it into the hands of millions of developers

Seems contradictory

[–] expr@programming.dev 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yup. Especially since it's written in Rust... Like why? Rust has a great cross-platform story.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

they've written a custom GPU framework to achieve the performance the level of performance they have. it's currently only compatible with macos, but is being ported to other operating systems.

[–] Blackmist 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How much GPU performance do you need for text?

[–] expr@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

For sure. If 32-year-old vim can handle multi-GB files smoothly, you don't need a GPU.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I remember when we ran text editors on a turnip. It wasn't much but we were happy.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why in the world wouldn't you just use Vulkan? Then it would still be portable to other platforms with probably still good performance, no?

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

vulkan is a graphics api, not a framework. their framework is using vulkan.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If their framework is using Vulkan, why is it not compatible with anything but MacOS? Isn't the point of Vulkan that it's cross platform?

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

It's not fundamentally incompatible, they just haven't written the code to make it compatible yet. GPU frameworks need a lot of OS specific code, so it will take some time for them to make it run perfectly on Linux.

[–] davawen@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is wrong. Their framework uses metal, which is an apple only graphics API.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

My bad, I was referring to the new Linux implementation which is using Vulkan, which was not clear. The MacOS implementation only supports Metal, as MacOS does not support Vulkan natively. I assume the Vulkan implementation will also be what is used for the Windows build.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

runs only on MacOS for now

it will be released on both Linux and Windows, with Linux support currently being the top ranking issue on their GitHub page. they have a tracking issue showing that many pr's have already been merged working towards Linux support.

[–] Mischala@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 months ago

I guess if you are committed to supporting a hard to support platform, may as well get it out of the way first?

But yeah, seems like a pretty poor release.