politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
This makes me wonder if team Trump isn't preemptively muddying the waters for pending news of Trump's inevitable death. I wonder if Trump got a prognosis recently and this is just a type of staw poll taken about how ready and willing the GOP would accept a replacement name on the ticket.
I think it was just a Twitter hack.
Both Occam's and Hanlon's razor agree on this one, it was almost certainly just a hack. Bet Don Jr. had a password like Trump2024 or something equally dumb, or he got his account phished, he doesn't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed.
And to add to matters, Musk has fired so much staff that I bet that Twitter's security has suffered. If your staff can barely keep the servers running while implementing the latest "cool new feature" that the boss insisted be made immediately and pushed live with zero testing, they're not going to be focused on maintaining server and application security.
(Source: I've been a web developer for over 25 years.)
I doubt it's a flaw in Twitter's security, if it was it would be more than just 1 account posting dumb content (well, dumber content than normal). There's also the fact that that particular code was probably done and battle tested ages ago, so unless someone went in and screwed with it it should keep working more or less fine and I don't think any of Muskrats recent changes would have touched the auth sections of the code. If this was like a DoS or the site was down or something then I'd bet it was some security flaw that was introduced, but this doesn't smell like E.G. a SQL injection or anything like that.