this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

4810 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She told Swedish media that she will not be appealing the verdict.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh maybe if you only want to cycle slowly around town, sure. For me, a bicycle is more for exercise than transportation.

It's kinda the same as saying 8k EUR gets you a new car. I mean yeah, it's technically true, it gets you a Dacia Sandero, but most people will still go for something they can actually enjoy.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you only want to cycle slowly around town

That's what bikes are for.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

That's what THAT bike is for. A good bike can be used to actually get to places in time. Hence why I didn't know people under 60 get those in other countries.

I'm just saying it's weird to call the bare minimum "the price of a new X" in a comparison.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what? this is a standard bike that anyone here would consider a proper bicycle, perfectly usable.

Like, the netherlands (where almost everyone rides a bike on the regular) is known for largely consisting of this kind of bike, it's all you need and buying something more expensive just poses a risk of theft or damage.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Difference in cycling cultures I suppose. Around here this would be considered an old lady bike. It's great for slowly cruising around the city, but I just wouldn't feel comfortable at high speeds, or on trails, etc. I prefer to get everywhere fast like a bat out of hell (an ADHD trait, going anything but my full speed, full-on anaerobic on my commute even, feels wrong and tedious) and need a single bicycle to work on roads, streets and trails, so I got this low-mid range hybrid. This is the most common type of bike here (well actually now fatbikes are more common, but that's a stupid trend. And I suppose full-on mountain bikes are very popular too).

[–] tchotchony@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, you're right, this is a bike meant for transportation, not sports. Still counts as a bike though, so original comment is right too. Everybody in the Netherlands and Belgium has one of these (and if you wanna do cyclocross or bmx or fast road cycling, you have a second, third, ... bike)

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Ah yeah Estonia is not rich enough for everyone to buy 5 bikes so we buy one that can do everything.