this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
268 points (97.5% liked)

movies

1814 readers
700 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
maegul@lemmy.ml
Blaze@lemm.ee
UKFilmNerd
orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
neidu2@feddit.nl
Emperor
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
maegul@lemm.ee
268
Borderlands' theatrical run grinds to a halt with just $31 million worldwide, which is barely enough to cover the marketing costs (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 months ago by Emperor to c/movies@lemm.ee
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So that's bad, yeah, but just how bad is it? With help from Google and The Numbers' movie comparison feature, I can tell you this: It's really bad.

I present to you...

An Incomplete List of Shitty Videogame Movies That Made More Money Than Borderlands

(in no particular order)

  • Warcraft ($439 million)
  • Max Payne ($88 million) Doom ($59 million)
  • Street Fighter ($99 million)
  • Assassin's Creed ($241 million)
  • Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time ($336 million)
  • Hitman ($99 million)
  • Mortal Kombat (but Mortal Kombat is actually good) ($122 million)
  • Need for Speed ($194 million)
  • Five Nights at Freddy's ($297 million)
  • Uncharted ($401 million)

One big-budget, big(ish)-cast Hollywood film Borderlands managed to beat, which I bring up only because I paid good money to see it in theaters and I'm still sore about the whole thing, is Wing Commander, an utterly execrable celluloid waste of time and effort that bumbled to $11.5 million globally. Frankly I'm surprised it did that well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The Warcraft movie wasn't even bad, they just didn't go hard enough. It was impossible to cram that whole story into one movie. They shoulda done a Hobbit with it.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

If they literally just made a trilogy of the wc3 campaigns they would've easily made decent cinema. While the arthas storyline is a little derivative (as most things blizzard makes) it is still the best epic saga they made to date, aside from perhaps the original StarCraft and broodwar shakespearean intrigue fiesta.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven't watched the Warcraft games (to a degree that I memorize the story) do you think the Warcraft movie will be entertaining for me?

(I have tried to finish WIII several times, but for one reason or another I always end up quitting, not liking the game is not one of them πŸ˜…).

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly, if you don't know the game stories, it will be a confusing mess. They take very little time on the movie to explain what is happening and why.