this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
60 points (94.1% liked)

Australia

3605 readers
67 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not support the voice?

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The 'Progressive No' movement has pretty valid reasons to be against it, though as a non-Indigenous Australian I find it very difficult to consider voting no myself. The fact that I actually get to vote on this is honestly ridiculous, particularly when my vote is worth twice that of someone who it is supposed to be benefiting.

[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean, the fact that Dutton is supporting No would be enough reason for me to vote Yes

Edit: I am not saying this is the only reason. I very much believe that the first nations peoples should have a Voice

[–] skribe@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Voting because someone else does or doesn't vote this way or that is sport not politics. I would hope that most people take it far more seriously.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

You write that like they don't both exist . And anyway, recognising the actions and policies of a political figure as being a polar opposite to your belief system is still a valid call.

[–] billytheid@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

spite is a powerful motivator.

[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

My guess is the reverse is true also in that Dutton supporters will vote no because he is.

[–] billytheid@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The simple truth is this is how modern politics works, you take the wins you can and keep scraping and clawing away for more, it's why the desperately avaricious are drawn to it.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah they keep saying there is a sound progressive case for no, but even Thorpe had a mouthful of nothing when asked to elaborate.

Saying you have reasons that you then won't state isn't the same as an actual argument

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by your 'vote is worth twice that of someone who it is supposed to be benefiting'?

Is that in reference to the 'double-majority', where NT and ACT don't count for the 'majority of States' count (because a large number of Aboriginal and Torrest Strait islander people live in the NT)?

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's correct. I live in SA, so my vote counts towards both majorities. Technically there are more Indigenous Australians living in the states than the territories (according to the ABS), but the NT is where a lot of the remaining Indigenous communities (who government "help" is usually targeted towards) reside.