this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
414 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ofc it wouldn't. It's very illegal, but Tesla knows this. They're using it as a threat to control what the buyers should do.

And also, you have rights in the EU. You can't sue people as a multi mega corp for nothing.

[–] echodot 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You can't sue people for nothing in the US either. They have a few laws. - You're allowed to try but it'll get kicked out of court.

It's all bark and no bite, if anyone actually tried it they wouldn't be able to do anything. As long as the price is paid off Tesla don't own the vehicle so they have no rights over it.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Getting to the point where you get it kicked out of court will still cost you enough to ruin you financially though. So it’s a great deterrent.

[–] wmassingham@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So yeah, you can sue for anything. But even if you know you'd never win the lawsuit, you can tie the other person up in court and waste their time and money.

[–] singron@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If you sue for too little, the case will get summary judgement, but that doesn't really seem like a risk in this case unless there is a specific law that makes this clause unenforceable.