this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
779 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32091 readers
1126 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The internet doesn't tend to like to pay the actual cost for things. You'll find very little sympathy for paid services, especially here on Lemmy.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yes but we do agree with fair pay

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Tidal has the highest artist payouts typically, besides YouTube I believe.

Make your choices ppl.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

those choices of the minority won't matter in the long run when the other service is cheaper and has the fatter marketing budget.

just look at the refusal of normies to adopt something like mastodon just because you need a couple extra steps.

[–] spacesatan@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that for youtube videos not youtube music? Pretty sure YT music pays less than spotify by a wide margin.

[–] AnaGram@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Found a handy little Music Streaming Royalties Calculator thing in this article. It's not 100% accurate because none of the services pay the same rate for every song, but it shows how huge the payout discrepancies are.

[–] Piafraus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there objective way to define what is fair? Otherwise words "fair pay" make 0 sense

[–] And009@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago

True it's probably going to become an outdated concept and what is really needed would be an universal basic income

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

Can get fair pay if the customers aren't paying