this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
272 points (96.9% liked)

Games

16729 readers
637 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"I can't stress enough how often I'd hear a retail rep declare a genre/style/look was dead with zero supporting data."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beckerist@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (14 children)

CRPG apparently translates to "Computer RPG"

I'm still not sure what it means

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 10 months ago (13 children)

It’s games like the original baldur’s gate and stuff. I think a clear defining thing is that you have a zoomed out perspective and you click where to move

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

Close, but that's a CMMOPRPG

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yildo@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The combat has to be turn-based or it becomes an ARPG like Diablo/Dungeon Siege/Titan Quest/Torchlight

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Most of the CRPGs are RTWP rather than turn based though. Though I personally prefer turn based.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

RTWP = Real-Time with Pause, in case you were confused like me

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's an RPG on a computer? Specifically tabletop, like Dungeons and Dragons or Pathfinder, but on a computer. Example games : Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, The Temple of Elemental Evil, etc.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More recent examples include Dragon Age Origins, BG3, Pillars of Eternity 1/2, Tyranny, and Wasteland 1-3

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Listing wasteland 1 is kinda funny since it came out back in 1988.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right but I thought if I just said 2-3 is get a comment like "Wasteland 1 is a CRPG too!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I think the more contemporary meaning for the word is “classic” rpg. Which better communicates the old isometric view and party-based adventuring.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

vs. Tabletop role playing games.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Well back in the day an RPG was DnD.

They made computers and some nerds tried bringing that to computers, so we got CRPGs which helped you know if you meant tabletop or computer, and also that you didn’t mean JRPG.

Now CRPGs are just called RPGs and RPGs are called Table Top RPGs

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

CRPG = Baldurs Gate 1+2, Icewind Dale 1+2, Neverwinter Nights 1+2, Planescape Torment, Age of Decadence, Nox

Isometric RPG or CRPG, basically the same thing.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

One tries to recreate an RPG campaign as close as possible to table-top RPG, but on a computer. Was the original definition back when "possible" was very limited.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Long time ago RPG used to refer to pen and paper RPGs like dungeons and dragons by default. When pc games using these systems got made, like baldurs gate, they were referred to as cRPGs to distinguish them.

Nowadays video games are so popular that when someone says RPG it means the computer game, but due to tradition / nostalgia CRPG is still used to describe the genre of games inspired by the pen and paper RPGs.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

Also refers to classic RPG. Usually specifically refers to isometric 'realtime with pause'/plausible realtime games, with 'complex' dialogue options.

It the same as Metroidvania or Soulslike where it's kind of a vibe with sticky design choice but not 100% clear. I remember seeing arguments about whether Divinity Original Sin 2 was one because it was purely turn based

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Top down RPGs heavily inspired or influenced by table top RPGs like pathfinder and d&d. Also either turn based and real time with pause. Classic examples include fallout 1 and 2, neverwinter nights and baldurs gate 1 and 2. Modern examples include divinity original sin 1 and 2, baldurs gate 3 and wasteland 2 and 3.

I always see debates about what's an rpg, crpg, jrpg and strategy RPG yet when I hear action RPG I think f allout or elder scrolls, when I hear crpg I think baldurs gate, when I hear jrpg I think final fantasy or persona and when I hear strategy RPG I think fire emblem or disgea.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MudMan@kbin.social 43 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I mean... yeah, retailer gut checks were a major driver for the industry for ages. The entire myth of the videogame crash in the early eighties, blown out of proportion as it is, comes down to retailers having a bad feeling about gaming after Atari. I'm big on preservation and physical media, but don't downplay the schadenfreude caused by the absolutely toxic videogame retail industry entirely collapsing after digital distribution became a thing. I'll buy direct to consumer from boutique retailers all day before I go back to buckets of games stolen from little kids and retailers keeping shelf space hostage based on how some rep's E3's afterparties went.

That said, those guys really did flood the market with cookie cutter games in a very short time there for a while. There were a LOT of these.

Weirdly, Neverwinter Nights must have done extremely well for how much credit Bioware gives it for redefining the genre, but at the time I remember being frustrated by it. It looked worse than the 2D stuff, the user generated content stuff was fun to mess with it didn't create the huge endless content mill you'd expect from something like that today.

I should go look up if there's any data about how commercially successful it really was somewhere. Any pointers?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 10 months ago

Agreed about Neverwinter Nights, BG2 was (and remains) one of my favourite games and I remember being super hyped for NWN. Being an earlyish transition to 3D really did hurt it visually, much the same as how Final Fantasy VI has aged much better than VII graphically.

The big letdown for me though was the cut down party size. BG2 was defined by the companions and party banter and I recall NWN feeling extremely lacking in comparison.

The post BG2 hype combined with the move to 3D and the very heavily advertised campaign builder probably built very intense hype though, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if NWN sold extremely well despite not having as lasting of a legacy as BG2 for example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emptyother@programming.dev 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm no fan of sports games. I dont play sports games. Also the kind of people I hang with also dislike sports games. And the last sport games I read about, a decade ago, had horrible reviews and awful graphics. So therefor I declare the Sports game genre for dead! /s

[–] Lath@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The /s is not needed. I was quite impressed to hear that EA Sports is one of the main money makers of EA despite having each new game as a buggier version of a previous one, only with an updated roster. I had no idea they were so popular and the last FIFA I played properly was in 2003.
So we are out there and we do think like that.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Did you know that EA lost the FIFA license? FIFA decided that they wanted the whole cake so they’ve taken to developing the future FIFA games themselves.

EA is obviously continuing to develop their golden cow, now called EA Sports FC.

[–] Lath@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I didn't. Huh. Still, golden cow is right. Because what it produces is still a pile of manure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emptyother@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huh. I was wondering about the name change when I bought FC 24 for my nephew this xmas. He made it very clear that they had changed names so that I didnt buy the wrong one, but he didnt say why it had changed. 🤯

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yep, that’s why! I’m guessing he was clear because he wanted the newest version of the same game. No idea if the official game is any good or not. Could be it’s a complete disaster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

For me, the problem is "isometric". There have been very few games like that I've finished compared to others. It feels artificially constrained, especially in a 3D environment, when visibility is limited to like <10 meters away from your character. It's worse if the camera rotates because then I find it quite hard to make a mental map.

I don't have this issue with a top-down perspective generally. Maybe those tend to be more 2D (even if rendered they can't really include environmental verticality) so it's easier to navigate.

[–] Blaidd@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dragon Age: Origins had the perfect camera that let you look around like an action game and then switch to the tactical camera. It's astounding that modern rpgs cannot match how good the camera was in a game from 2009.

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I adore BG3. But fighting the camera is harder than fighting the mobs.

Although it did get easier when I started using a controller to get around and a mouse to fight.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago (7 children)

IMO there's very few instances where an isometric camera makes sense these days unless you're explicitly trying to capture the nostalgia of old isometric games.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I always assumed it was the rise of consoles that was to blame, as CRPGs are a bit more cumbersome to control on those platforms. BG3 proved it's possible, but it's certainly not the platform it was built to be played on.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Casual players, shorter sessions, rise of first\third person action games like TES\DA targeting the same crowd, acting and dubbing characters to the same standard BG3 just did. Classic CRPGs like NWN do seem risky and expensive.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

It's amazing how much dubs can help hold a player's attention. My mate loves 40k way more than DND 5E but he can't play Rogue Trader with me for hours on end because it was strategically dubbed while BG3 was comprehensively dubbed.

load more comments
view more: next ›