this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
343 points (96.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35548 readers
223 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 105 points 11 months ago (5 children)

This is why you want uBlock Origin:

The internet has become unusable without an ad blocker. At this point, any browser that doesn't include one is just a cybersecurity hazard. The NSA and CIA consider ad blockers a security measure, at least.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It really has. Ublock is so versatile, too. It can block pretty much anything. I loathe using browsers without it installed.

[–] kaboom36@ani.social 8 points 11 months ago

its so nice to just delete annoying parts of websites with it

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 11 months ago

I even install it on work computers. It's not just plainly sexually explicit ads. It's malware. Just say no to ads.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it's about to get EVEN MORE unusable, because increasingly the alleged/so-called "content" behind the nag-wall is utterly mindless AI-generated sludge.

[–] wishthane@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Also so many sites that haven't given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls... which I'm okay with in principle, but in reality I can't afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally

There's going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn't mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium)

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We're starting to see IT departments deploy it by default too!

[–] Agility0971@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

true heroes

[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

a matrix enjoyer, I see.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 57 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A perfect example for why having an adblocker is a necessity these days.

[–] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I first used uBlock origin 2 years ago and I will never go back to browsing without an adblocker

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

Moral imperative.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Chances are, unless you made the website yourself, you don't know who made certain decisions; who did specific work; how many people were actually available to do that work; how much pressure from shareholders there was to maximize income at the expense of user experience; any fiduciary challenges faced; or how often you had to overcome the urge to make a worthwhile product to further your goal of fitting as much ad space into a single page as possible (this one is HUGE).

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

the even more disturbing trend of late is that

  1. nobody made any decisions
  2. nobody did any specific work
  3. nobody was available to do the work

because an AI generated the entire content on the basis of an off-hand suggestion plugged in by a Search API directly reading some user's query and shitting out a vapid, insipid extrapolation of that query in the rough shape of an article on-the-spot and brute force slamming SEO algorithms with keywords so it's the first ten items you see when the search concludes.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't get why some people just refuse to use ad-blockers. They work absolutely flawlessly and I have not encountered an experience such as this in almost a decade.

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Just DNS alone would have blocked all on that page.

[–] fury@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even worse is taking over the back button / back gesture to redirect you to "more to read before you go"

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah I really wish Firefox ignored all of the dynamic "pages" or whatever it uses that causes back to just go to a different part of the same page. Go back to the last page that I clicked a link on. I know how to scroll back up.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Does that work for what looks like some apps internal browser?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

It looks like Firefox or mull to me

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago

Absolutely, use an adblocker. You might even find that "reader mode" works just as well to force articles to be coherent.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is your fault for not using an adblocker /s

[–] Maven@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I'm not sure how to change the default browser that the Google news feeds opens up to on a pixel phone. Ever since posting this though I've been looking at other launchers with a need feed that let me open it in another browser.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can't. Even when Firefox with uBO is your default browser and any other app just uses Firefox as the built-in browser, Google News will resort to Chrome.

Workaroud: Open the website in Firefox instead of using the app - https://news.google.com/

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It will open Firefox or whatever your default browser is if you delete chrome or freeze it.

It won't open the usual webpage though, it will open and create a new tab in the browser, at least that is the behavior that I face with Firefox Beta.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For me (on Firefox non-beta) it just opens the in-app browser and shoves ads down my throat. I just checked it, Chrome is disabled and cannot be uninstalled on my phone.

When I have a page opened in the Google News App, I can tap the menu and select to open the web page from there. Then it gets opened in Firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I have two solutions for you:

  1. Get rid of the Google feed which is crap, and a total BS that it doesn't support your default browser unless disabling or getting rid of Chrome, you can use an app like Discovery Killer to get rid of it and replace it for another app, as I'm currently using Kvaesitso I have no need for doing that (Discovery Killer currently frozen), I can't recall if the app needs root though (root FTW anyway).

  2. Continue to use it if you enjoy trash news sites with clic baits and such, you can block ads at a DNS level, through android settings or if you have a PiHole at the house, personally I use AdAway rooted version (root FTW x2) and my PiHole at house and with a VPN outside, I'm pretty sure AdAway tooks first, but meh, let's have some redundancy 😂

I'm pretty sure that could have been mentioned in this thread but I just wanted to explain my setup.

[–] AzureFrost@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

You need to disable the setting to "open web pages in the app", you can find it in the general section in the Google feed settings. If your default browser is not chrome, it should open in that browser.

[–] eogram@fedia.io 2 points 11 months ago

If you don't want to change launchers, you can use the blockada app. Activates as a vpn and blocks ads device-wide. https://blokada.org/#download

[–] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If it lets you disable Chrome (long tap → App Info), then do that. Otherwise you should use ADB to uninstall it like bloatware.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

I think the funniest part is that the browser even blocked some crap the site wanted to shove at you by default. This isn't even the intended experience!

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

That's why I use Firefox (Fennec to be exact) on Android with uBlock Origin.

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

…otherwise, I agree with the message. Developers are fighting the process, decisions, environment and often other development decisions along the way.

It’s time for a cool, refreshing Pepsi.

/s, as needed.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm working to overcome a particularly troublesome piece of technology right now and enjoying a cold, refreshing, Diet Dr. Pepper, so I guess the sentiment stands.

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean, wouldn’t you rather be a Pepper too?

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

I would just not read it. It's not worth it. Get back to my stupid memes.

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

And people wonder why nobody actually reads the article. Far easier to just read the headline on Lemmy and the expert commentary in the comments.

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I recommended you use an alternative browser like Samsung Internet, or a Chromium fork called Cromite (UI like Chrome but without Google services). They, along with Firefox, Edge etc. have ad blocker support.

After finding one you like, go into Chrome's app settings and click "Disable" in the middle, so Google Discover won't force you to open in Chrome even if it's not your default browser.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

With Firefox mobile now supporting plug-ins, it's easily the best mobile browser. I think it's the best desktop browser as well, but that's more debatable.

[–] Tiefa@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

The ability to sync tabs from Firefox mobile to desktop and vice versa is a huge selling point of desktop Firefox use. I'm not well versed in the best desktop browsers but when I swapped three months ago to double Firefox I've been very happy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Vivaldi browser is good for sites like that because you can use simplified view, which removes all the shit and just gives you the article text.

The Reading Mode app on Android does this too.

[–] Louisoix@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Here's some love for the reading mode

[–] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Probably not worth the read anyways. I disable the adblocker to gauge the quality of a website. If it's a complete ad cluaterfuck, I never go to the website again.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Fuck Amway.

[–] Sprokes@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

Get yourself ubo.

[–] Redward@yiffit.net 2 points 11 months ago

Or don’t act like Ubisoft where you make teams develop some mechanic for 6 to 24 months only to can it in the end.

load more comments
view more: next ›