this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
222 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2686 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So maybe the huge worry people had after the news that WHO would classify it as cancerous was a little too much. I think the media could have reported on it in a bit more responsible way.

(page 3) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fearout@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sodium cyclamate is a superior sweetener taste-wise anyway, nothing comes even close. And I’m prepared to die on that hill.

Why don’t brands use it I wonder?

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's still banned in the US, so brands that want to use it would have to have US specific formulas or not desire to sell there.

That's a lot of brands, for sure, but depending on where you are, they might not be the brands you see.

[–] fearout@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn’t know about that. Why is it banned? Isn’t it safer than most alternatives too?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] downpunxx@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The problem being, of course, that those that drink things like Diet Coke, are addicted to drinking things like Diet Coke, this hedging after the fact, is such nonsense, and meant to soothe the ruffled feathers of diet beverage manufacturers who advertise with News organizations. If the thing is cancerous, then it's cancerous, now you know, don't keep printing stories saying "a little poison is fine, if you watch it" lol

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look up the Linear No-Threshold Model. Same logic applies here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Saff@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m going to need someone to define “limited” for me.

Ultimately I think I’d rather take this chance than drink 20 grams of sugar in a can instead!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tag365@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What is aspartame? The name suggests something inappropriate to be put in a drink, like a drug.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chadarius@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So actually no. It isn't really safe. Coca-Cola and the rest of the beverage industry is just as bad as big tobacco.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›