this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
3 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] small44@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it still possible to subscribe to communities from those two instances?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psythrichor@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty happy with this decision. I don't have time or the headspace for uncalibrated posts on otherwise interesting topics. It feels good here. Glad it's to remain that way.

[–] halictuz@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've read somehwhere that lemmy.world now requires an email at least. Not sure if that changes anything at all though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rimlogger@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Geez, the concept of federation is already splintering. I understand you guys have your reasons but this just splinters the fediverse and makes it worse for users.

[–] Limeade@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes things better for users who want a well moderated space. These sites are public, so it's not like you can't log out to view what's going on in a community if you still want to follow it. It'll probably end up being similar to how redditors interact with tweets, if someone sees something interesting they probably will screenshot/copy it and pop it into a community they do have an account with to continue the discussion there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhc02@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I have no idea whether this is the right decision or the wrong decision, but kudos to you for stepping up and making a decision.

[–] Calvinball@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I made an account here after reading the mission statement. The very ideals beehaw stands for were the appeal. I support what you are doing, I want this to continue to feel a safe space.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I find ironic is that there has been so much encouragement to not be a lurker and comment. But, it's by logging out and being a lurker that you can actually see new content not available on your instance once a defed happens even if you subscribed.

[–] Nicktar@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just to put an additional perspective on this. Beehaw has been and/or had to defederate instances before to become and stay the safe space everyone here's enjoying. The only major difference here is that this time it hit two major instances and not because of actions or goals of the majority of their population or admins but because the sheer size of the instances made the small percentage of their users, who act in what is considered a bad way, made it to much to handle.

According to this list of Awesome Lemmy Instances, there are 5 instances who's count of blocked instances is way above every other instance (like 5 times more). Beehaw is one of those, in fact Beehaw is on top of that list. While this of course isn't desirable, it made the communities we have here possible in first place and helped shape them into what they're now. Just check the blocked instances list.

I think, just closing the valve on certain pipes is a legitimate course of action in a situation where there is more pressure than the receiver can handle, especially in short term while other measures are put into place (like getting better tools to handle the pressure or expecting the general pressure to go down). If the only two options for this valve are "fully open" and "fully closed" it seems to me like the only course of action to prevent overpressure from flooding the whole place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluejay@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I really appreciate the commentary and transparency you guys have around your decisions - as someone that does not know nearly as much about federation I appreciate yall giving a framework for me to understand how to approach these topics. Really hope this takes some load off of your guys' backs.

[–] pixel@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, not to be cold to this decision (because I totally understand that this didn't come lightly and don't want to "well ackshually" the mod team) but given I'm new to the fediverse as a concept, what does this mean for me as an end-user? Can I no longer engage with those communities at all? Or rather, what does defederating mean overall?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] csolisr@social.azkware.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well. Guess I'll have to go and spin my own self-hosted version of Kbin just to be able to follow everything, without being at the mercy of third-party admins cutting my subscriptions in a whim. Also, I sure hope that the communities either move into Beehaw or outside of it, fragmentation out of the users' control makes the entire point of federation moot.

[–] cduke23@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s always your choice. I think the consensus for the community is that we support the admins because Beehaw isn’t intended to replace Reddit or Twitter. We’re all here to have a more intimate community, like a local coffee shop where you know everyone. My experience has been that these kinds of intimate gatherings allow for more diversity, while maintaining a safer space. We can have respectful differences of opinion without worrying about the hostility that often follows disagreements online. Like a coffee shop, the desire for social cohesion has more of an influence than the desire to be right at all costs like on Twitter/Reddit. Just my two cents. I’m supportive of this, because I know if I ever have a concern I can talk to my friends (Beehaw team) about it. If we can’t agree, I can always find a new friend group and neither party will have hard feelings. I’d like to think it won’t come to that, because of the kind of community Beehaw is. This is exactly the same decision I would make if it were my call.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks for the heads up.

I totally support your decision. I’m happy to hear that it’s not permanent and can be reevaluated.

Is it possible, or maybe it already exists, but can there be a list of sites that we are not federated with?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] astromd@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

So I’m pretty new to all of this, but does defederation mean that I’m not able to access any of the communities on those instances, while browsing this instance on the web or in an app? Does it mean that I need to create an account on those instances directly?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What is the effect of this? Does it mean I cannot subscribe and interact with communities there OR just that they cannot do that with ours? I ask because I have one or two communities I need there. Sorry if this is too obvious a question. Thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] altair222@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

thank you for this community! i may not back a lot of what beehaw stands for but this is very welcomed!

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 1 points 1 year ago (17 children)

these two instances’ open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;

I'm on an instance that has open registration and I haven't seen any "trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;"

the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;

Sounds like confirmation bias. Can I see actual statistics?

our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;

"safe space" is ambiguous, what are your requirements for a "safe space"

and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt

Sounds like confirmation bias. Can I see actual statistics?

and others of whom simply don’t care about what our instance stands for

Your instance stands for censorship

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] patchymoose@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I respect the decision for what you guys want to make Beehaw. If this decision isn't for me, is there some instance out there that federates with everything? I just want to see every post from the whole Fediverse. Is there any instance that provides that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kaldo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty new here so dunno how much it counts, but for what it's worth I think it's a good idea. I've recently seen quite a few users that have been posting from these instances and it seemed to me like they are just trying to instigate conflict or drama rather than build a community. The way they have write is aggressive and rude but not enough to break any specific rules, which must be hell to moderate. The mods here have been amazing so far so if this will help them, I'm all for it.

~~Besides, it shouldn't affect users too much - we can still manually go and subscribe to defederated instances and see that in the "subscribed" feed, right? This just means it's not discoverable through "All", and vice versa.~~

edit: I was wrong, it seems defederating completely stops content flow between instances, the things I've been seeing on subscribed page is old stuff from before the defederation. Still, a bit tricky but not insurmountable if it makes for a better sense of community in the end.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›