this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
371 points (95.4% liked)

AssholeDesign

7593 readers
2 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That is not 2 separate buttons on the right, like I initially thought clicking through checkout.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dragnet@lemmy.fmhy.ml 81 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I don't understand why there is so much defense for this in the comments. Amazon is a huge company with professional design teams, if part of their checkout process is even a little misleading in favor of an upsell it is definitely intentional.

[–] Uriel238@lemmy.fmhy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

Yes. That's Amazon using dark patterns. This demonstrates that enshittification is not confined to social media.

Ooop, it may have happened even before Twitter, Reddit etc.

From Corey Doctorow: Ultimately, it doesn't matter if Amazon's enshittification is because [Jeff] Bezos was a cynic or because he sold out. Once Amazon could make more money by screwing its customers, that screw-job became a fait accompli.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By the way, it is and amazon is already being sued by the US FTC.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Internally they called cancellations the Iliad Process. If that isn't a sign that everything is super totally above board I don't know what is.

[–] GatoB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

With a small fine with huge benefits as always?

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

TBD, but I would not be suprised. As an aside, I did not see any such shenenigans when buying from Amazon most likely because EU tends to be more liberal with the fines.

[–] 312@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why would it be two buttons on the right, and what behavior would you expect if “Cancel Anytime” was a button?

The goal of this is to get you to sign up for Prime, so there’s nothing yet to cancel.

This is “annoying” design in the sense that getting an upsell is annoying, but I don’t really see it as malicious/asshole.

[–] rishabh@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would still say it's an asshole design. They are trying to copy a well established internet Design Trend where a 'Not Now' sort of a button is slightly greyed out near the advertisement. I would assume the next trick would be to sneakily add the prime fees in the total and some unsuspecting user would fall for it. Not to mention, the whole fiasco of how hard Amazon made it to cancel the prime subscription. Fuck these companies.

[–] zosu@vlemmy.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah, next is, you must watch three one minute ads and answer 10 questions about the content of the ads correctly to continue without prime and there will be a captcha displayed under the questions, which will be timed out after question 10 and you will have to start over from video one to get another try. However, when the server notices your IP already got the ad once, it will throttle the bandwidth, so the video buffers every 3 seconds. When you finally made it to the checkout, some items became unavailable or slightly more expensive and you have to go back to the basket to update it.

[–] bergkoenig@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

You need to be banned from working in web design lol

[–] 312@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

It’s not possible to know from this screenshot alone if “Cancel Anytime” is a clickable target or if it’s just text, but when taking a quick glance at least to my eyes the options seem pretty clearly delineated.

Amazon sucks and they are plenty predatory, I’m just saying this is a pretty mild example of hostile UI if at all.

[–] Sami@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's absolutely, 100% intentionally misleading. They even recognize that internally and are currently being sued for just that.

In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the agency accused Amazon of using deceptive designs, known as “dark patterns,” to deceive consumers into enrolling in Prime, which provides subscribers with perks such as faster shipping for an fee of $139 annually, or $14.99 a month.

The FTC said Amazon made it difficult for customers to purchase an item without also subscribing to Prime. In some cases, consumers were presented with a button to complete their transactions — which didn’t clearly state it would also enroll them in Prime.

Getting out of a subscription was often too complicated, and Amazon leadership slowed or rejected changes that would have made canceling easier, the complaint said.

Internally, Amazon called the process “Iliad,” a reference to the ancient Greek poem about lengthy siege of Troy during the Trojan war.

https://toronto.citynews.ca/2023/06/21/amazon-prime-without-consent/

[–] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget when they were automatically signing people with an Amazon Echo to Amazon Music. I had to cancel that twice and neither time was there ever a comment or email stating I was enrolled.

[–] 312@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The examples in the FTC complaint are all well and good, and as I already said, Amazon sucks and their predatory practices are well-known, but this specific example, the one we’re talking about on this post, is pretty pedestrian.

If the OP were to post the 7-step process it takes to cancel a prime membership, that would be firmly and wholly in asshole design territory, I know, I’ve had to go through it myself. But just posting a screenshot of a mild upsell that has a clear set of binary options on opposite sides of the screen and saying “Amazon bad” doesn’t really contribute much - everyone knows Amazon sucks, and there are plenty of examples of them sucking, this just really isn’t a very good one.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Common UI has "yes" and "no" (or whatever terms) next to each other, often in different colors. This is mimicing it so you think it's two separate buttons when it's one button for "yes".

And has "cancel ..." like you'd expect on a cancel button. If you stop reading or are skimming (we all do it) you think it's the cancel button. This is very likely a deliberate choice.

Different color, common placement, the word "cancel ...", you go on autopilot, and now you're subscribed! And good luck trying to cancel.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] dm21@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a quick inspection the left barely looks like it’s worth reading and it’s easy to miss the link, so you’re led to thinking there’s a yes and a no button on the right. Click the no button and you’ve subscribed to Prime.

Obviously if you stop and actually look at everything you’ll realise what’s up. But this relies on you rushing and being misled in to signing up, which clearly works for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I downloaded the Amazon app a while back. The first message that popped up with a "join prime" screen. I very nearly tapped the join button because it was the only button on the screen and I wasn't paying attention - I had to scroll to find the "maybe later" button. They seem to love their hostile UI.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 22 points 1 year ago

I accidentally signed up for prime that way, and it was a pain to cancel. This shit should definitely be illegal.

[–] Leviathan@feddit.ch 21 points 1 year ago

I actually clicked on "continue without Amazon Prime" once and the next screen said congratulations new prime member. I had to search how to undo my free month trial that auto renews smh

[–] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Dark patterns are real and everywhere now.

[–] sudo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Saw this post moments after seeing yours

https://lemmy.world/post/1030772 "FTC sues Amazon for 'tricking and trapping' people in Prime subscription"

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I was trying to buy some stuff on the app and even though I said NO, I noticed I had Prime at checkout. I might have missed something, but it asked me three times about canceling and got emails about it. None about signing up though. I was waiting for them to be sued.

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I was trying to buy some stuff on the app and even though I said NO, I noticed I had Prime at checkout. I might have missed something, but it asked me three times about canceling and got emails about it. None about signing up though. I was waiting for them to be sued.

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I was trying to buy some stuff on the app and even though I said NO, I noticed I had Prime at checkout. I might have missed something, but it asked me three times about canceling and got emails about it. None about signing up though. I was waiting for them to be sued.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Solution: stop using Amazon

[–] 418teapot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Seriously, I can't think of a single good reason to use amazon in 2023. Not only are they usually more expensive than buying directly from a manufacturer or other retailer, but you run the risk of getting a counterfeit item and not notice within the return window. Not to mention the fact that you're contributing to the further monopoly they have on online retail. Support smaller online retailers, almost all of them have a return policy equal to amazon's.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that's illegal in the EU.

[–] ronondex@mlem.a-smol-cat.fr 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately this is a nightmare to regulate. Whatever regulation a government will come up with, amazon (and all other big tech) will do everything to maliciously comply.

Look at the french regulation on book prices. The french "directorate for competition, consumers, fraud punishment" told amazon that they could not sell books with free shipping. Books have regulated price in France to garantee equal access to everyone everywhere. The DGCCRF claimed that offering free shipping de facto lowered the price of the books and was unfair to small local book shops. The next day, amazon introduced €0.01 shipping for books...

I'm all for regulating these assholes to ensure fair competition. But regulating them is not as simple as some people make it sound like. I would hate to be a lawmaker.

[–] Squiglet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's misleading and deceptive. They're being sued for it right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›