this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
58 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39161 readers
2426 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The missile fired by Russia at Ukraine last week, hailed by Putin as a new kind of experimental hypersonic weapon, was actually an application of old technology used for many years in intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), six military experts told Reuters.

An examination by two of these experts of the debris recovered from the new intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), known in Russian as the Oreshnik, or hazel tree, showed how it dropped multiple payloads across the target area, a characteristic of ICBMs.

After the missile strike, Putin said the Oreshnik was hypersonic and could not be intercepted. But Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California, noted that all ballistic missiles of that range are hypersonic, and that missile interceptors such as Israel's Arrow 3 and the U.S. SM-3 Block 2A were designed to destroy them.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Weapons of this kind are best intercepted in space. Which is, hugely expensive - and the weapons themselves are very expensive too.

They are not very useful, except as a nuclear threat - because they cannot be precisely targeted. A warhead of this sort flies blind during re-entry into atmosphere - relying on inertial navigation, because air is turning into glowing plasma around it - onboard cameras or radar are useless at this point.

The result is low precision, and with a conventional warhead, if an attack misses the target by hundreds of meters, the attack has most likely failed. This attack missed the Pivdenmash (former Yuzhmash) factory by hundreds of meters.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago

"But Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California... "

Holy shit that title is a fucking mouthful