this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
438 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4353 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frazw@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Anything which drives nails into the xitter coffin is a good thing as far as I'm concerned. Bluesky may not tick many people's boxes here on lemmy, but this migration shows that lots of people wanted to leave xitter but didn't see an option. Threads clearly didn't attract them, likely due to the owner. I hope it nothing else, Bluesky is a less toxic place and xitter and musk become less relevant. In the long run Bluesky may end up being another head of the hydra , but for now, it's not, and it may get people used to the idea of federation.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That decentralized and self-hostable platforms like Lemmy are fringe does not give me hope for the future of social networks on the Internet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Meltrax@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Whhhhhhy?

This is the same thing. This is the exact same type of platform that will eventually go the same way. This is shooting yourself in the foot once, then aiming the shotgun at the other foot and pulling the trigger thinking that the bullet was a fluke the first time.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be fair Musk buying twitter and turning it into a Nazi propaganda site was kind of flukey.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 13 points 1 week ago

Twitter was already really bad, Musk just brought back the Nazis and fired all the people that were the guardrails.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Bluesky just got major investment from a crypto bro...

It's not flukey...

[–] Meltrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Was it though?

A billionaire buys or funds a privately owned platform and does with it as he pleases, despite the obviously humanitarian route being something different. Have we really never seen that before?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

Because most people switching don’t know (or care) about the fediverse and decentralization. They are regular internet users who just want to get away from the cesspool that is twitter, so they go where other people are going.

[–] staticsoar@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shame that it's another Capital-owned platform taking the spotlight. I'm not surprised unfortunately. We'll be in the same place we are now in 10 years.

I'm preaching to the choir, but mastodon is the better platform if you want more authentic community and conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I'm really enjoying Bluesky strangely enough, not normally my thing.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How does another social media ruled by a billionaire gives hope?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because it shows that a sizable amount of people are at least anti-nazi enough to move platform.

Yes, it would be nicer if they moved to mastodon, but nobody even knows what that is, nobody is there (classic chicken and egg problem), and people get confused by the whole "choose an instance/server" thing.

Is it not ok to have a small celebration of people moving to a better, more positive platform, even if it is far from perfect?

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Anybody recommend a good mastodon instance?

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

my personal solo instance is great but the admin is an asshole.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pick any instance that suits your interests: https://joinmastodon.org/en/servers There is also this picker.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is really cool, it helped me find an instance that specializes in shitposting, much appreciated!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope some of them come to the Fediverse. It's nice that only the curious ones will come.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago

It's venture capital. Eventually it will stop being open source and will enshitify just like every other platform. So nothing is changing long term in my opinion.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this time it actually has some teeth to it, even big famous artists like Lack are on blue sky now, my feed is looking pretty good daily now where before I had to wait a few days before checking it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

If it was owned by the community that moderated it, then yes. But no it's owned by another rich asshole.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

quite the opposite for me. bluesky is a centralized platform owned by capital exactly like twitter, thus prone to the same issues.

migrating to bluesky instead of mastodon will just delay the problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The main thing I would like to know is why so many people nowadays want a microblog platform, whether it is X or Bluesky or Mastodon, and why community-based platforms like Lemmy are getting relatively little attention in comparison.

Is it just that these people weren't seriously online before the rise of microblogs? They didn't start out with phpBB-style forums, so don't miss their existence and think that individuals having followers is the normal state of the Internet? I'm genuinely not super sure what's going on.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People have different tastes, which can vary.

Microblogging is something more casual, and has more focus on the people sharing content. Community foruns are revolved around the content shared, so you don't really get to know people, so it has a difference on what they actually want.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Someone has to do a mastodon instance called Bluesky

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

is also decentralized and is federated, meaning it is moving toward a future where users “own” their audiences and can port them elsewhere (you can, and many do, argue about the details here, and about the differences between ActivityPub, which Mastodon uses, and the AT Protocol, which Bluesky uses).

Best coverage yet for that alone

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The wrong migration to IMHO…

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›