this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
438 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4461 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 33 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

If people moving from one corpo owned platform to another corpo owned platform gives you hope for the future of the internet: You haven't been paying attention to the history of the internet at all.

Once they have critical mass, the enshittification for profit will begin a new.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

But it means people are still capable of caring.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

At least it theoretically has account portability...but yes, I fear people are setting themselves up to be enshittified again, as Cory Doctorow has brought up

[–] Ottomade@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 days ago

Idk why people think the average user is going to go to Mastodon. I’m glad anything else other than Twitter or Threads is popping off.

Mastodon could have worked sooner if it was more approachable.

[–] dukethorion@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Why does everyone suddenly forget BSky was created by Jack Dorsey?

It's going to be another Twitter. Bring everyone in, AI scrape all the data, then sell when the climate moves too far in one direction.

Or is this like the Great Reddit Exodus, that lasted maybe a month?

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

OP has posted (and re-posted) about Bluesky about 40 times in the last 48 hours. I’m down voting every single one. Quit shilling for billionaires.

[–] DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Are they a bot??

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

So ppl switching from one VC-funded centralised corpo platform to another VC-funded (slitghly less) centralised corpo platform is a good thing?

big X

just because it's OSS doesn't make it good. The corp still hold all the power and might sell out, but at least they got free volunteers to program for them so the C-level could get more money!

(now don't tell me that Bluesky is "federated". They still hold all the power over site rules and moderation. The only little concession you get is that you are allowed to host your own data)

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Bluesky is VC-funded. Enshittification incoming.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Right up until you sit through his 6min speech on 1A. It’s like the goal is to turn all social media platforms into Twitter.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Right up until you sit through his 6min speech on 1A. It’s like the goal is to turn all social media platforms into Twitter.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 141 points 1 week ago (27 children)

I like Jason but he completely missed the boat on this one.

The active migration away from social media networks that are owned, controlled by, and distorted by the richest men and most powerful companies in the world to a decentralized platform that is not owned and controlled by billionaires is one of the more hopeful things to happen in what has largely been a bleak year for the human internet as AI slop infects everything and billionaires put their thumbs on the scale of what we see on social media.

He says this and yet jumps to Bluesky, a platform created by Jack Dorsey and now owned and managed by a crypto bro? You don't need powers of prophecy to see where Bluesky is headed.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly I don't know what's up with the mass delusion about Bluesky being oligarch-free. It's understandable that most don't know or haven't looked into it, but then some folks that should know better are displaying the same ignorance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 138 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Lemmy does not understand that people are leaving X cuz of Nazis, not cuz it’s a centralized corpo platform.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The CEO of Bluesky just posted they hit 17M users today after hitting 16M in the last 24 hours.

The juice is juicin'.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

People are leaving Muskrats fascist supporting platform. So what if they aren't going to Mastedon, they're leaving Twitter. Isn't that enough for us?

I don't need Mastedon to win. I just want Twitter to lose. Once Twitter has been (hopefully) de-platformed we can talk about Mastedon and the Fediverse and the idea of a non-corpo platform.

But it terms of main stream casual appeal, Mastedon still doesn't have it yet, and that's okay.

Mastedon needs to get more casual with the introduction to the Fediverse because for everyday non-tech people, it can be a little confusing.

People see Bluesky as the Twitter replacement because of its simplicity.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Once Twitter has been (hopefully) de-platformed we can talk about Mastedon and the Fediverse and the idea of a non-corpo platform.

BlueSky is as prone to enshittification as Twitter. If you're waiting for BlueSky to take off, you're just setting yourself up for the next rug pull.

I mean, go to BS and enjoy it while it lasts. But don't think this is the future.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Well said. Maybe there's more to do in the hardware, software and general computing training such that the layman could safely deploy their own Website like we used to be able to do. Then everyone could have their own servers at home like some of us do. True decentralized communication.

Lemmy would be great for dare I say it...church congregations for example. Schools, mechanic forums, unofficial student associations like alpha Kapa whatever. ETC. it's a momentous opportunity.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, it's better to move forward a little than to go backwards. When you move forward you can keep moving forward more later. If you move backwards you have to fight for what you lost before you can get more back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 week ago

Bluesky is not great, but it's at least (for now) a better platform than X and the AT protocol is actually very well written. (For instance having a moderation service separated from the service that provides the posts I think is a hands-down better way to handle it than most ActivityPub servers having their admins handle all incoming and outgoing moderation)

Bluesky federation is just now getting started so it'll be interesting to see if it goes anywhere/where it goes.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Anything which drives nails into the xitter coffin is a good thing as far as I'm concerned. Bluesky may not tick many people's boxes here on lemmy, but this migration shows that lots of people wanted to leave xitter but didn't see an option. Threads clearly didn't attract them, likely due to the owner. I hope it nothing else, Bluesky is a less toxic place and xitter and musk become less relevant. In the long run Bluesky may end up being another head of the hydra , but for now, it's not, and it may get people used to the idea of federation.

load more comments
view more: next ›