this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1024 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually we called them Mitläufer (going along with the dominant party in fear of punishment)... but they sure weren't any better than Nazis.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I dont really fault someone for joining a party bcz they don't want to be shot and drug through the dirt.

[–] Diddlydee 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I've never seen or heard anyone use drug as the past tense of drag in my long-legged life.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 10 points 3 weeks ago

Actually you have, right before you wrote that comment.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

Drig, Drag, Drug

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess it's an irregular use of the word. Maybe where I grew up, or I'm tired today. Dunno.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's cromulent, don't worry about it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh boy here we go again

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They are at fault. If everyone that didn’t refuse join because of such reasons didn’t join there would be no one to do the shotting and the dragging.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

Boy wait until you hear about forced religious conversions.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Assuming everyone coordinates and works together to fight it. It's much easier to kill someone who refuses to join than it is to protect them.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well sure, it really only takes about 30% of a population to subjugation, and another 30% to not give a crap. But that's not what we're talking about here. Besides, easy to sit on a phone and be brave and say you'd stand up to an oppressive regime. Harder to do when someone actually points a gun at you.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What if your culture was the inspiration for the nazis?

History furnishes us with innumerable instances that prove this law. It shows, with a startling clarity, that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood with that of an inferior race the result has been the downfall of the people who were the standard-bearers of a higher culture. In North America, where the population is prevalently Teutonic, and where those elements intermingled with the inferior race only to a very small degree, we have a quality of mankind and a civilization which are different from those of Central and South America. In these latter countries the immigrants--who mainly belonged to the Latin races--mated with the aborigines, sometimes to a very large extent indeed. In this case we have a clear and decisive example of the effect produced by the mixture of races. But in North America the Teutonic element, which has kept its racial stock pure and did not mix it with any other racial stock, has come to dominate the American Continent and will remain master of it as long as that element does not fall a victim to the habit of adulterating its blood.

https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt - Main Kampf

Jim Crow was Hitler's inspiration tor the Nuremberg laws.

Black GIs then came back from liberating Europe.

To by lynched from trees for being 'Uppity'.

This is the heritage they are proud of:

[–] lath@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sounds like a bunch of shitty historians.

Of course the motives matter, most of all for a good historian. Those who wish to reconstruct the past shall not be deterred from their goal just because "nobody cares anymore". Fidelity to an accurate representation of the past is the only acceptable rendition of history, otherwise why even bother.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The history of Western Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Americas is littered with "reformed Nazis" who came out of the 2nd World War pledging themselves to the cause of US/UK Capitalist Imperialism. It is not merely that we disregarded the intentions of the Reluctant Wehrmacht. It is that we found many of these fascists to be useful - either as expendable shock troops during the Cold War or as spies, scientists, and bureaucrats in postwar states still invested in a politically correct form of apartheid.

You can find the breadcrumb trail of German Fascism leading out of Berlin and into Buenos Aeries, Cape Town, and Huntsville Alabama. These fuckers never actually went away.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Don't forget about the regular capitalists. Many of the richest German industrialists today are direct heirs of Nazis who actively helped Hitler gain power, built a personal empire from slave labor, faced no consequences for their actions, and were allowed to keep operating after the war.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

They never went away because their ideals were not defeated. They went away into a USA that segregated blacks from whites and had Japanese internment camps. You blame Nazis as the source, but they are merely a symptom of a human condition. And as long as we don't collectively uplift ourselves, it's never going to be overcome, no matter how many proponents are killed off or muffled in the background.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok so what would you call them?

[–] lath@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Well, I'd like to call them people. Wanna know why? I'll tell you even if you don't. It's because despite our choices in life, we are all people. We can hate each other, renounce our humanity or run away from the truth with a myriad of excuses, but at the heart of the matter we are all people.

As long as you never let go of that concept, you will understand that those that do let go become capable of incredible harm to one another. And when that happens, the main point to be wary of isn't when they will do incredible harm, but whether to join them in letting go as well. Because once you join them in this, you too will be capable of causing incredible harm.

Is that train of thought wrong? Or is killing each other the only real answer?

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 weeks ago

"I'm socially liberal but financially ~~nazi~~ conservative"

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›