What a joke, unless you stop shoving AI and it's mindboggling demands for energy into everything your not serious about carbon emissions
Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
What they really care about is investors, some of which happen to care about ESG. The E stands for environment, so this way Microsoft can write many pages of greenwashing nonsense on their ESG report in order to attract investors without actually hurting their bottom line that much. Microsoft looks green, investors are happy, it’s a win-win… Oh but the energy consumption is still through the roof, but we don’t talk about that.
M$, carbon negative?
lol.
FIRE'S FAVOURITE FOOD !
What happens when someone hits it with a truck, plane or explosive?
Concrete and steel can take a beating. Maybe they should just look at low emitting concrete
It blows up, but the redundancy kicks in and the services start running from a different data center.
They're not supposed to be fail proof.
But they should be secure from attack. We are talking about a data center housing lots of important data.
I'm sure MS has figured that part out but I wonder how.
What makes you think that a big corporation, this one in particular, wants to do due diligence?
Because if they didn't there would be compliance issues which would lead to customers moving to AWS