this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
549 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How about 4 monkeys in parallel?

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, and add an Agile framework. Extreme Monkey typing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Switch to AMD. More monkeys.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Oh yeah? Name ONE ape that wrote Shakespeare. Go on I’ll wait

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But what if we had infinite monkeys 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Let's use our braincells to fix real problems first. Like pants that don't stretch.

[–] echodot 6 points 3 weeks ago

If a tree folds in the forest and there's no one there to hear it does it make a sound?

For this experiment scientists recruited Gilbert, no one really pays much attention to him, and it's assumed the universe won't either.

[–] style99@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

This sort of study shows you more how mathematicians think than how science or philosophy works.

[–] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I feel like there has to be more to this problem than pure probability. We ought to consider practical nuances like the tendency to randomly mash keys that are closer together rather than assume a uniform distribution.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I always heard that it was an infinite number of monkeys, not just one. So one of them might get the job done in time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I've read there are so many permutations of a standard deck of 52 playing cards, that in all the times decks have been shuffled through history, there's almost no chance any given arrangement has ever been repeated. If we could teach monkeys to shuffle cards I wonder how long it would take them to do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

Really, it just takes an infinite amount of monkeys one time.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

This is a false flag study to undermine public support for mathematics research!

[–] aleonem@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What if it's a smart monkey?

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Of our sample size, 100% of “smart” (capable of symbolic language) monkey species have already written Hamlet.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Abiogenisis in shambles again

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›