this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
160 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

5385 readers
269 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anzo@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dear all, please remember that engaging with trolls can get you banned (rule of thumb, half the time the offender gets for themselves)

Write what you want others to read, I don't care if there are disagreements. But go get a private chat room if you want to exchange insults with them :)

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 118 points 1 month ago (34 children)

They expect the special operation to take only a month.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Developers mysteriously pushed ~~through~~ to Windows.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 month ago
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 75 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Go for it. That's one of the benefits of being FOSS, and other countries have their own versions of Linux already (that meet whatever dumb authoritarian rules are required).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (6 children)

A national fork? In Russia?

Sometimes the jokes write themselves.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 46 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ok, that was always allowed!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not just use Red Star Linux? I thought Jong Un and Vlad were besties.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well to be pedantic, Red Star is a custom DE on top of Linux, not a kernel

[–] zelnix@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 month ago (29 children)

Okay then, that was always allowed

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

regardless, a country should maintain their own fork regardless if its being used for government computers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Oh man I fucking called this one, as soon as I read that article a few days ago saying that the Russian maintainers were removed from the kernel, I'm like man if Russia was smart right now they would do a country-funded version, this is completely legal as well under the licensing of the current kernel.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

In Russia, Linux forks you!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would be very surprised if such a fork would diverge from Linux. I would guess that this would be little more than a branch with (most likely) support for Russian hardware. Just my hunch.

A legitimate hard fork doesn't seem particularly smart to me, but what do I know...

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

It's not about a divergent featureset, it's about making sure Russian businesses can continue to legally use Linux if the US decides to make that the next step

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only possible because its FOSS. Hopefully this shows more governments why FOSS is awesome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›