this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

UK Politics

3098 readers
125 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The primary internal opposition to a full-blown youth mobility scheme is coming from Starmer’s top interior minister Yvette Cooper.

Wut πŸ˜’... Yvette Cooper? The fuck?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

8 years and a number of Prime Ministers I'd find embarrassing as an Australian after the referendum, and we're still discussing what the Brexit deal should look like. Great job, lads.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's as though, maybe, brexit shouldn't have been a thing?

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hindsight is 20-20, I suppose.

...Though in this case, so was foresight.

[–] HumanPenguin 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah apparently foresight is only 51-49 with mutually exclusive ideas fitting together.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

51-49 of those people who voted

[–] HumanPenguin 4 points 1 month ago

Divided parties representing a divided country.

In a FPTP political sustem that dose not support compramise well.

We have mostly had around 60% of our voters disagree with the government. As 30 fo 40% is normal to wing 50+ % of seats.

FPTP is crap for democracy but good for larger parties to hord power.

Yet we are far to divided to put replacing it as the main priority.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is it really so hard to say "hey we fucked up, the majority of people wanna be in the eu, we're going to rejoin, lets do it"?

[–] mannycalavera 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes because sadly like the Tories, Labour are just chasing power and votes and don't want to upset a majority in their voter base. Otherwise they'd have policies like the Greens and Lib Dems.

[–] HumanPenguin 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are correct.

But how many of the policies the greens or lib dems have. Do they get implement.

Unfortunatly until voters are prepared to place ending fptp above everything else.

Only parties able to pull 30 to 40% of vorers will have any real power.

[–] mannycalavera 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agree with that. And sadly those parties play to their extremes to win those majorities. And double sadness is that their extremes are a majority anti EU (when put together) πŸ˜”.

[–] HumanPenguin 4 points 1 month ago

Agreed.

But lets remember those same parties used rhe EU as an excuse for over 40 years.

They built that extream. Then expected the ref to go for the EU.

They built the mess. Fucked up and are now taking advantage of their owb shit slinging.