this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
190 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JesusSon@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

Old son, we been on this road for a piece now.

[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 52 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Proud child rapist and convicted felon Donald Trump needs to be in prison, not in the ground. Dying just lets him get away with his numerous numerous crimes without punishment. Hopefully he makes a full recovery and can rot for many years to come, preferably without any additional votes gained from surviving an assassination attempt

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago

Agreed. He's old AF and lives on McDonald's - death isn't that far off anyways. More to the point, everybody dies . Death isn't justice. Everybody dies. The only way for America to heal from what he's done is for him to see the inside of a jail cell. That possibility seems increasingly remote.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's wild how the US allow convicted felon to be in politic, even worst so run for president.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But they can’t vote. You can run the country, but your vote doesn’t count.

[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Point of note, child rapist and convicted felon Donald Trump specifically will likely be able to vote. Florida law is that felons convicted in other states follow the law of that state for if a felon is allowed to vote. New York law is that only incarcerated felons lose their vote. So unless he's sentenced to prison and the sentence starts before November he'll be able to vote in Florida without any additional special treatment

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

And even if that weren’t true, he could vote anyway because he has God Mode from his past presidency, no?

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

At that point, we're just doing it to be petty. Not like we're gonna reform him and make him see the error in his ways in there. It's just punishment for punishment's sake.

An assassination attempt was logical at face value, at least. Trump poses a threat, so you eliminate that threat, just as you would an animal stalking you. Of course, killing trump isn't actually going to end this craziness.

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

But how do you put someone that's above the law in jail?

[–] PepperoniNipple@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

His children should pay too. They are becoming like him

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

Sorry old man, you're 8 years too fucking late, at minimum.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Funny how the powerful have nothing against violence when it's the military industrial complex (including the Israel extension) killing poor and defenseless civilians in the tens or even hundreds of thousands, but the moment someone tries to assassinate a tyrant, violence is abhorrent.

I would argue that it's the other way around: the only murder that's ever acceptable, even beneficial to the common good, is the assassination of a tyrant whom the people cannot get rid of in any other way.

A tyrant such as the Mango Mussolini, future fascist dictator of the United States.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

America must also not go down the road of 1930s Germany.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

Then do something about it you piece of shit. One man is responsible for the majority of the particularly violent rhetoric, and one party is responsible for nearly all of it.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

People in power really don't like The myth of decorum, a “polite” society coming to end. People can see how silly it is to say this while being active in an ongoing genocide. There is no unifying with Trump cultists. They are not good people even if they are my fellow countrymen.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

He means the road that has already existed in American politics for over a hundred years and now resembles a highway.

[–] UserNameIsRequired@lemy.lol 5 points 4 months ago

I’m fine with it.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

So true. He should have had the military do this a few weeks ago, if not years ago.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's right. Violence like this will only beget more violence. We need to be clear on our side that we don't endorse anything of the kind.

[–] DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’m not gonna lie: if yesterday had gone a different way, I’d’ve been pretty happy about it.

Dude, it’s weird. I don’t actually care about the details of the assassination beyond the fact that it didn’t work. I don’t think I’ve ever felt this way about a person before. It’s very odd.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I've been going back and forth about this all day. On one hand, I think it's obvious that Trump is a symptom of the right wing's systemic slide into open authoritarianism, rather than its architect... but on the other hand, I don't think his cult of personality would have long outlived him (especially if it turned out he was assassinated by a fellow right-winger over his ties to Epstein) and there's not many figures on the right who would be able to reconstitute it quickly. On the other hand, I don't think his cult members would go gentle into the night, and there would be ugly, violent reprisals. On the other hand, I fear there's going to be violence no matter what, and it's probably better for it to happen before the election than after for a host of reasons. But on the other hand, etc., etc...