this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
563 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2080 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 172 points 6 months ago (7 children)

They're OK with having a convicted criminal for president. He was a criminal for the entire term.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago (3 children)

He's been a criminal for all of his adult life. He's just rich and white and flew under the radar enough. If he had just fucked off into retirement on some island rather than becoming president (and committing more crimes) you'd probably never hear about him anymore and he could have lived in peace.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

They say some people are so poor, all they have is money.

But he got tired of money, he gets off on power and being the prophet of his little cult

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Trump can't win with only 58 percent of the Republican vote. He needs somewhere in area of at least 80 - 90 percent. I see this survey result as good news.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Polls don't mean shit. When the time comes, go out and vote!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Surveys are back to trump beating Biden by several points

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The only people answering those sorts of polls are weirdo old people. Which heavily skews towards Crime Boss Donald

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

According to farmers and rural hickabillies in the countryside of red state usa, Trump has a commanding lead over Biden.

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Lmao yeah man I have a weirdo old grandma in Florida and she answers every single poll she can. Bet you can’t imagine who she votes for

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Polls are also incredibly unreliable this far out in the most unpredictable election the country has seen in recent history.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The opposite of what they said in 2016. That's Republicanism for you. No values or integrity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So ... Don't drain the swamp?

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Well they started drinking the swamp water and realized that they liked the taste of sewage

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suction@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

How often are we going to act surprised that it's a cult, and he is their Fuhrer? This is getting ridiculous, the time for analysis of their side is over. We should long be in the phase of action.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (10 children)

They were OK before the ruling too so long as there's an (R) behind the name.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trying to find it again, but I had seen a set of polls earlier where they had asked some republicans "Would you be ok with a convicted felon as president?" and other republicans "would you be ok with Trump as president if he were a convicted felon?", and the ones asked the Trump version had said yes at a much higher rate than the generic question.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 36 points 5 months ago

No surprise. They ended up agreeing that he was guilty of impeachable offenses too, but were okay with it and didn't want him to be kicked out or made non-electable because of them. "One of us", literally.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 33 points 5 months ago

So they will stop background checks for jobs?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 30 points 6 months ago
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 24 points 5 months ago

34 Felonies is fine and dandy with the party of law and order. Fucking clowns.

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago

They are completely blinded by this guy.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 5 months ago

Then they can't claim to be the party of law and order anymore.

Unfortunately they won't need to. They've been playing a different game than the rest of us.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 5 months ago

There's this thing called the Overton Window. Republicans are way past that. It's no longer relevant. Whatever their guy does will always be fine while if his opponents do it, it will be the end of all that is good and just.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (11 children)

M'fers brains are just broken. How do we survive this.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

How soft on crime of them

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

This should surprise no one. We all know that "rule of law" was just something they meant to be applied to uppity womenz, POC, immigrants, liberals, etc...

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The head of Nixon in a jar must be super pissed right about now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, look, Republican hypocrisy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Everything the Republicans do is projection. One of the purest forms of "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 12 points 5 months ago

In groups to protect, outgroups to bind.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

"more swamp for the swamp creatures!"

load more comments
view more: next ›