this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
252 points (97.0% liked)

Gaming

20091 readers
7 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Actually "rationalising the pipeline" would be getting rid of all the massively overpaid execs, rather than the people who actually make the Take-Two execs their money

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 28 points 7 months ago

Absolutely sickening. Yeah, we can't afford you people actually doing the money making and Jeremy's new yacht. It was a tough decision, i swear

[–] bilb@lem.monster 1 points 7 months ago

People always say this, but the execs and board members making obscene money for doing as little a possible is the whole point of the endeavor.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Not defending corporations but these massive conglomerates usually get so intricate, so messy, that there are people who end up getting a paycheck that genuinely do not get assignments. In other words, getting paid to watch paint dry. So sometimes the comments that look terrible are directed at people who were doing nothing or very nearly nothing and still getting paid for it.

But yes also fuck executives getting x80 the pay of developers.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

Maybe we should rationalize their CEO with an actual pipeline, to use another euphemism...

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

i wonder how 5% of employees getting laid off will translate into executive bonuses. last year the top 2 guys made $72 million after laying off a bunch of people.

[–] GlowHuddy@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

And ofc it's just to raise their stock a little bit :) Big corpos are real life monsters

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago

Yay capitalism. The pursuit of infinite quarterly profit will fuck and enshitify everything we've ever known.

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 16 points 7 months ago

This company literally prints money but it's not good enough without the human suffering.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

"Fat trim" is the other one I recently heard, and it's absolutely the worst one I've heard so far. Glad they consider humans working their best as "fat"...

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Whatever happened to "We're firing people because we realised we can do the job with fewer workers so we want to save money"?

At least then it's honest.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Honest would be "We're firing people to make our short term profits look better. That's what my bonuses are based on, after all!".

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

you've never been even remotely close to the cult of management have you?

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

🏴‍☠️GTA 6🏴‍☠️

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, for the first bunch of years PC users won't have any choice but to emulate

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Only reason they're launching on consoles first is probably because Sony paid for it.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Losing their jobs through no fault of their own, mind you. Disgusting behaviour by Take-Two just to line their shareholders pockets.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

This is business as usual for Rockstar development. Historically they wait until right after they ship, though.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is such a bad time for me to be trying to get back into the game industry fml

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago

might be better off trying to make the next indie darling.