this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
1391 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
4130 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 56 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I don't like this because it's not addressing the actual saying. Obviously the saying is about chicken eggs specifically.

But I've always felt obviously the egg came first. The first chicken was born in an egg, so the egg came first. That egg could have been produced from a creature with a mutation which caused it to produce the first chicken egg when it is not itself the exact same species.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah, but when that line of tiny change is so arbitrary... Is it a true chicken until it grows up and fulfils its destiny? Is it a chicken based purely on its genetic code, so the egg whence it hatched is a chicken egg; or is it truly a chicken when it becomes a chicken..... meh, I write this far and find I still agree with you: even in that case the egg it hatched from becomes a chicken egg by virtue of the chicken it grew into.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In other words, the question becomes: "Is an egg defined by the creature that laid it, or the creature that will hatch from it?"

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hatch or grow. Because once you're asking those questions, is the first chick truly the first chicken?

"Is a juvenile defined by what it currently is or what it will/might become?" And, "is chicken-ness an innate quality of the animal, or in relation to the animal fulfilling/presenting (or being able to fulfil) some chicken-ness?"

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

The thing that defines chicken-ness is crossing the road. So if the egg rolled across the road before hatching does that mean the egg is a chicken egg?

But of course the chicken must also see the other side of the road. Since it's impossible for see outside of the egg before hatching it might be the egg lacks sufficient chicken-ness to be considered a chicken egg.

But once the egg hatches the chicken will see the other side of the road. So if the egg crosses the road and the chicken that hatches from the egg sees the other side of the road, both the egg and chicken must both be considered to be sufficiently chickenly to complete the sequence required to establish the complete chicken.

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

This shit is getting deep

[–] srecko@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

It's somehiw obvious now, but the question appeared 25 centuries ago when it wasn't even remotely clear what was the answer.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago

But I think it's not about chicken at all. People just don't know which creature on earth laid the first egg, so the chicken is just a stand-in. As chicken are the species we most associate with eggs for obvious reasons. What came first: the first egg or the first egg-laying creature? Has to be the egg-laying creature, but then how did that get born?

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe this is correct as I read in a book somewhere that it was a kind of proto-chicken if you will, that laid an egg of which came a the first chicken.

The more interesting question is how long did it take for the first BBQ Chicken.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Real question is which came first, BBQ chicken or the Eggs Benedict?

That is an interesting one.

I did a quick search using Arc and it says eggs Benedict was 1860s and BBQ. Chicken is unknown.