this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
1458 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
653 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 175 points 6 months ago (5 children)

So... SCOTUS decides in Trump's favor, Biden has him assassinated, Biden wins election.

Trump is arguing that this will be OK, right? Right?

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 98 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I wish someone would confront Trump about that during an interview. “So, do you have an armed guard, because you’re saying Biden can legally kill you?”

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And then far right media would parrot for weeks that Biden actually wants to kill Trump. If they did what they did for a “stolen election” imagine what they would do if they had “reason” to suspect that Trump could be assassinated at Bidens wish

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

That's their favorite stance. Because then they can claim moral righteousness. If you can't get an upper hand logically, the next is emotionally.

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago

They would recognize worthy opponents

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 27 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'd be pretty surprised if there were a private security option capable of holding off the military, if the president really wanted someone dead and had the legal go-ahead.

I'd be really surprised if Trump could afford them.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then there's the military's 'knife bomb'...

"While other versions of the Hellfire take out targets in the expected ways — through explosive force or with shrapnel — the R9X crushes or slices a target to death. It is essentially a flying bundle of swords that can kill the occupant of a car without harming people around the vehicle."

How SOCOM's secret 'knife bomb' became the prime weapon for killing hard-to-reach terrorists

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You've also forgotten the easiest method - simply bribing (or in this case ordering, as the Secret Service still answers to Biden regardless of the fact that they protect Trump, AFAIK) someone close to him to kill him.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

That's very hard. You have to talk to someone and convince them. Or you can just dispatch a flight and go to dinner knowing it's done

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 11 points 6 months ago

He's a broke bitch, owes half a billion in foreign loans alone. On another note, what kind of security force would be willing to suicide for him? His cult45? They have a combined IQ of an air conditioned room, the military would take them out like mowing your grass.

[–] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm aware. I'm not sure what exactly the secret service is going to do about a salvo of hellfire missiles. If the president of the US wants you dead and isn't legally restrained I certainly wouldn't trade places with you.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Hey, three hookers and an eight-ball will keep that USSS detail busy. No problemo.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Lol if this were legal, there isn't an armed guard, or even military on the planet that could save you from a us president with a gbu_28 on deck

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is why they are delaying it until after the election. If Biden wins, they continue to stretch out the trial until Trump dies because of his old age and bad health, then go, "Well the defendant is dead so no reason to rule on this", leaving it open until they get another chance

If Trump wins, then they rule in Trump's favour with the trial suddenly going at breakneck speed

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago

No, they'll decide the bullshit immunity in June. But the delay is correct. By putting off deciding, they've delayed the actual trial until after the election. Fucking illegitimate Supreme Court. They didn't waste time saying Colorado couldn't leave him off the ballot, even going out of their way to not address the 14th Amendment disqualification.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Well Trump will obviously wait until he's installed himself as a dictator in perpetuity before making this ok

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

SCOTUS would just argue it isn’t an official act if Biden does it.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If they decide that Presidents have total immunity, Biden better disappear a bunch of the SCOTUS, as well as a bunch of the insurrectionist Republicans. I don't want to have an authoritarian in charge, but if I had to choose between Biden or trump, the choice is pretty easy.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

After delivering democracy to other countries over past few decades, USA has one last job. And this time, it's personal.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Technically Biden would have to shoot the man himself, anyone he could order to do it either cannot legally and would basically just be eating the legal bullet for him even though he's not in danger of it, or they have a legal duty to refuse the order.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It legitimately would not surprise me in 2024, if Biden just straight up shot trump during a debate.

We'd all be line "what!" Then go back to paying bills

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It legitimately would not surprise me in 2024, if Biden just straight up shot trump during a debate.

"Man, I asked you to shut up!"

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying we can have some kind of tournament for the presidency?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

.....maybe if we reduce it to a figurehead head of state role