this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
1402 points (96.1% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
4139 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
1402
Recognize the mother of Wifi (i.imgflip.com)
submitted 7 months ago by perishthethought@lemm.ee to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
150 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What's your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FBJimmy@lemmus.org 62 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Great to recognise this invention.

I was surprised by the choice of 'Mother of Wi-Fi' though - Wi-Fi hasn't used 'frequency hopping' as such since 802.11b was released back in 1999 - so very few people will have ever used frequency-hopping Wi-Fi.

GPS only uses it in some extreme cases I think, but I'm not an expert.

However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so 'Mother of Bluetooth' might have been more appropriate.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 74 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So her invention isn't used for Wifi now, but was used in the initial design of it? You might even say she helped give birth to it...

[–] FBJimmy@lemmus.org 45 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I guess my point is that it isn't a particularly important part of the design of Wi-Fi - they included it in the very first iteration in 1997 and realised by 1999 they didn't need it. Therefore Wi-Fi would likely have been born regardless of the invention; Bluetooth would not.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah but her work built on someone else's so we're taking it all away from her and calling them parents of her work so she gets nothing...

Doesn't feel as fun anymore, does it?

Let the guys dad have some credit for his work, give her credit for her work - I don't get what's so controversial.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so ‘Mother of Bluetooth’ might have been more appropriate.

Considering the namesake of Bluetooth, the "Mother of Bluetooth" sounds like the kind of person who would have a tea party with "Grendel's Mother" from Beowulf.