Programmer Humor

32588 readers

1070 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

455

Asking the important questions (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No framework will make FSM for you. Managing state of web ui is not as hard as managing state of game.

Using TCP for networking? Loss, retransmit, lag, you're dead. Using UDP for networking? Loss, desync, you're dead. Sending full game state? Congestion, loss, lag, dead. Doing sync right, but still pushing too much data? Congestion, loss, lag, dead. Also keeping on server you need not only track game state, but what game state client confirmed to receive.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Strictly speaking, the original commenter is talking about website but sure there is an FSM JS framework too (XState).