this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
1621 points (98.5% liked)

News

23409 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

From the bill itself:

(iii) by adding at the end the following:

"(3) With respect to any employee described in paragraph (2) who in any workweek is brought within the purview of this subsection by the amendments made to this Act by the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act, the employer of such employee may not reduce the total workweek compensation rate, including the regular rate at which the employee is employed, or any other employee benefit due to the employee being brought within the purview of this subsection by such amendments."

And yes, wages can definitely be determined by the government; see the Federal minimum-wage limit. Salary would remain the same; your hourly-wage would be increased by 1.25x.

[–] reflectedodds@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does the bill also include at least a 1.25x minimum wage increase to enforce this as well?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would be logical, but still would affect only people earning close to minimum wage.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It would increase pay for some, and leave others without their jobs. Same as any other minimum wage increase.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, but combined with shorter work week, which may cause some increase in the amount jobs of exactly for people earning close to minimum wage, the result may be less noticeable.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

If a shorter work week results in there being more jobs, that conflicts with the notion we’d get just as much done in 32 hours as in 40.

I guess you’re saying this effect is more likely in non-creative professions that simply can’t be compressed, which also happen to be the most likely to be minimum wage?

Then what you’ve accomplished is cutting the hours of higher earners from 40 to 32, and increasing the hours of minimum wage earners from 40 to 64.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Salary would remain the same

For somebody hired before the law is enacted.

EDIT: And minimum wage, if it's going to be increased, will mostly affect people earning the minimum wage. Obviously.