this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
181 points (95.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3528 readers
120 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
181
The real size of Australia (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Blaze@dormi.zone to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Long roads forging through nowhere? Check.

Has a senate? Check.

People being killed by scary animals? Check.

Uncontested on it's continent? Check.

On the edge of a giant desert? Check.

Seems about the same.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Uncontested on it’s continent? Check.

Emus would like a word...

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One small village of indomitable ~~Gauls~~ emus still holds out against the invaders.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Eventually overwhelmed and taken over by the barbarian hordes of thieves, social rejects and criminals they integrated into their society.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Mmm, I'm not sure that applies to Rome, haha.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I was thinking of the Roman legions integrating Germanic tribes into their ranks in the late Roman era which greatly diluted the Roman legions with a more ethically diverse group than in earlier periods. At one point there were more Roman soldiers that had never been to Rome or Italy than there were actual Romans.

To the Romans it was integrating barbarians. To the Germans it was Germanizing an occupying force.

At one point in history, the line between who changed who all depends on who is writing the narrative.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Okay, but I'm not sure I would castigate everyone non-Latin as being an outcast or criminal. If I didn't know better I'd suspect this is Cato the Younger's (or Elder's) alt.

Early Australian settlers, on the other hand... (Love you guys, but that's just facts. Make fun of our weather or something back)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 0 points 8 months ago

That is literally a revisionist narrative spread by racists arguing for ethnic purity and making up an example to disallow immigration and enable segregationist policies.

https://beyondforeignness.org/5724

Not a perfect write up, but a pretty solid one.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

And camels. If there's a God, I guess he figured the weirdly human-hostile insects would keep people from disturbing it, and so didn't plan for invasive species.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, it's a massive problem because they flourish in the outback and will decimate the vegetation. If you want to hunt camels that's a great choice of destination. Just watch out for the molestation flies.

[–] itsnotits@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Uncontested on its* continent

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what is the rule exactly? "Australia's" and "Rome's" both have an apostrophe, and that's what "it" is standing in for here.

[–] itsnotits@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, seems kind of goofy. For a word like "his", there is no counterpart "hi", but there is an "it".

[–] malijaffri@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm assuming that "him" is related to the hypothetical counterpart "hi"