TechTakes

1441 readers

50 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

Claude 3 notices when a sentence about pizza toppings doesn't fit with its surrounding text. Whole internet including Tim Sweeney and Margaret Mitchell concludes that it's probably self-aware now. (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/techtakes@awful.systems

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that whether or not an AI is self-aware isn't a technical question - it's a philosophical one.

And our current blinkered focus on STEM and only STEM has made it so that many (most?) of those most involved in AI R&D are woefully underequipped to make a sound judgment on such a matter.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not self aware, it’s just okay at faking it. Just because some people might believe it doesn’t make it so, people also don’t believe in global warming and think the earth is flat.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And our current blinkered focus on STEM and only STEM has made it so that many (most?) of those most involved in AI R&D are woefully underequipped to make a sound judgment on such a matter.

who would be equipped to make a sound judgment on such a matter?

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Philosophy majors.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 8 months ago

Don't even have to be majors, an introductory course in epistemology does wonders in breaking ones self-confidence, in a good way.