this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
1486 points (94.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5910 readers
2972 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
1486
Or they go to adtech (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by nifty@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
203 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They are not advertising those things because they are still in development, and can't (yet) be turned into a product.

You have very weird expectations on this topic and are moving the goalposts.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I never moved the goalposts, you misinterpreted my comment to make it easier to rebut.

I said we aren't seeing them work on any kind of AI MORE than we're seeing them work on generative AI for content creation. That much is true, and you haven't disproven it.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Am I understanding you correctly that you're now claiming you meant "the companies don't put more work into non-content generating AIs than into content generating AIs" instead of "the companies don't work on AIs apart from content generating AIs"?

If so, it's weird that you didn't initially clarify, and instead shifted your point to "they are not talking about it enough".

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Well you'll notice that's what my initial comment says, so yes, obviously that's what I always meant. My evidence for that statement which you tried to refute was that they aren't talking about it at ALL when you do a cursory search for their current AI projects. So it clearly can't be the primary focus. I'm not sure what you're having such a hard time understanding